-
Senior Member
before the question;
have a look around at how many of these dudes from all these companies are bald or thinning..
ask them if they feel the pain we do and get it a little more personal, then ask how long they think till something will be available that can help us
maybe ironic and they'll all have full heads of thick hair
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by JJJJrS
I think it's totally ridiculous to be asking about release dates and things like that when we don't even know how effective, if at all, the treatment is.
I'm more interested in getting a general sense of where things stand. So basically how far off are we from an effective treatment, what are the major obstacles holding the research back, is there anything interesting being worked on in the background/pipeline, and whether there's anything the online hair loss community can do to help out. Obviously, to get answers to these questions, you're going to have to poll as many of the top researchers there as possible before you can develop some type of consensus.
+1 JJJJrs (as always)
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
+1 JJJJrs (as always)
Yeah go with the JJJrs advice. There is no point in asking specific release dates, trying to go personal with them etc. Come on guys think if someone approaches you on the street and asks you how do you feel about your baldness. 90% of you would just ignore the question think "What a weirdo!" and move on.
I'm just interested to know if any of them are at all trying to go to clinical or pre-clinical trials. If none of them are, then it is time to move on.
-
Psychological 'tricks' are not going to get anyone to commit to a product release date at this conference.
If there is information to share they will be forth coming with it, if not, prepare to disappointed.
-
As they say, plan for the worst and hope for the best
-
No disrespect but where is Desmond with updates? Everyone's been sending money and he could have gotten the goal's worth weeks ago and people may still be sending money. Im not saying he has to be on here every second but an occasional status update and thank you would go a long way.
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
Dr. Roland Lauster/Beren Ataç[*]If the bioreactor creates exact duplicates of follicles that function as normal follicles, is it necessary to have them go through clinical trials for implanting considering hair transplants achieve this and have been approved as a method for commercial use.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...tem-cells.html
Ithink the article would answer this question. funny it is from 2010 an it quotes dr Lauster saying: "within five years (5 years timeline anyone) hair loss sufferers can grow new hair from their own stem cells and have it implanted their bald spots". since you say the people involved are there, lets hope they are their to start marketing. that is if the 5 years timeline holds true.
-
Originally Posted by brocktherock
No disrespect but where is Desmond with updates? Everyone's been sending money and he could have gotten the goal's worth weeks ago and people may still be sending money. Im not saying he has to be on here every second but an occasional status update and thank you would go a long way.
He's collected over $2,100 but Desmond is still pitching in a large amount on his own. I'd like him to have as much as possible (well, within reason, lol) just to cover any surprise costs.
-
Originally Posted by hgs1989
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...tem-cells.html
Ithink the article would answer this question. funny it is from 2010 an it quotes dr Lauster saying: "within five years (5 years timeline anyone) hair loss sufferers can grow new hair from their own stem cells and have it implanted their bald spots". since you say the people involved are there, lets hope they are their to start marketing. that is if the 5 years timeline holds true.
When stem cells are in question this 5 year prognosis for a new treatment are unrealistic. Mainly because there is always a danger of tumors forming from them when injected back into the receiving party. That is why they have to go through rigorous safety tests once they figure out how to mass produce stem cells and then differentiate them into hair follicles.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Sogeking
When stem cells are in question this 5 year prognosis for a new treatment are unrealistic. Mainly because there is always a danger of tumors forming from them when injected back into the receiving party. That is why they have to go through rigorous safety tests once they figure out how to mass produce stem cells and then differentiate them into hair follicles.
http://www.ipscell.com/2013/06/stem-...hat-work-when/
"...here is reason for some optimism that stem cells might actually treat or cure baldness in the future…but we are talking a decade or more from now."
Decade or more? Lord I hope that's not true.
Similar Threads
-
By Arashi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 185
Last Post: 05-25-2014, 02:20 AM
-
By Desmond84 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 93
Last Post: 05-11-2014, 01:41 PM
-
By NeedHairASAP in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 43
Last Post: 10-07-2013, 07:10 PM
-
By Desmond84 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 545
Last Post: 08-20-2013, 05:03 AM
-
By stayhopeful in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 18
Last Post: 04-23-2013, 05:59 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks