replicel
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Not really good or bad news... good news would be confirmation that their method works... even better news would be if their planned timeline of phase II trials wasn't a pathetic 39 months. Thats over 3 years... and thats not even adding the wait time until approval or commercialization.Comment
-
Of course its good news that the investors still believe in the product and that they expand/open in new locations.
I cant believe that you all are so negative. What is life worth without hope and dreams? Ofcourse it hurts a little more if you allowed yourself to hope and the dream dont come true. But i say as the Swedish poet Verner von Heidenstam:
-"Better listen to the string that broke than never tighten a bow".Comment
-
Of course its good news that the investors still believe in the product and that they expand/open in new locations.
I cant believe that you all are so negative. What is life worth without hope and dreams? Ofcourse it hurts a little more if you allowed yourself to hope and the dream dont come true. But i say as the Swedish poet Verner von Heidenstam:
-"Better listen to the string that broke than never tighten a bow".Comment
-
it seems like everyone comes close to getting a cure out there and then somewhere in the middle of phase 2 end up getting bought out or something happens where they prolong the trials. Follica may be our only shot, but hard to tell with how we have seen no evidence, just a couple statements here and there. Pilofocus? If there is 85% regen, then that would be huuuuuge.. hopefully no longer than a year and a half.. Im tired of waiting..Comment
-
-
That is my point. I prefer beeing dissaponted when/if they fail, over living my life as a pessimistic person that is afraid to hope.Comment
-
Comment
Comment