-
Any source that doesn't come from a tabloid and a pro-life website?
-
Originally Posted by bigentries
Any source that doesn't come from a tabloid and a pro-life website?
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...s-mice-embryos
Does this work? Couldn't find any pro-life stuff and I don't believe it to be a tabloid.
-
This page quotes Nature
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/st...very-1.2515327
Are they the same thing? They only talk about mouse cells. I can't find a reputable source about the human cells.
This source claims it hasn't been replicated
http://www.boston.com/news/science/b...dBQK/blog.html
One of the guys involved is responsible for the infamous "ear mouse"
http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle...MbK/story.html
-
Originally Posted by bigentries
Wouldn't it be nice if these guys started doing work on humans instead of mice?
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
Wouldn't it be nice if these guys started doing work on humans instead of mice?
They are
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...an-tissue.html
But I can't find any reputable source claiming they have already been successful
-
Senior Member
-
Originally Posted by Desmond84
Well guys, all the naysayers last month were claiming this was another mice study and simply dipping human cells in acid will not yield stem cells! Well, to the surprise of many scientists, this simple and incredibly cheap technique (less than $100) has just shown to work in humans...We have managed to reduce the cost 100 fold in less than 3 years now that's exciting. Prepare yourself for a revolution in biotechnology and regenerative medicine
Researchers herald greatest medical breakthrough of the age, deriving stem cells from human skin cells
Scientists are heralding a massive breakthrough in stem cell research today, after a team of American and Japanese researchers announced yesterday that they had succeeded in turning human skin cells into fully pluripotent stem cells, a move many have said may be the greatest medical breakthrough of recent times.
The technique involved an incredibly simple process of bathing the human skin cells in a weak citric acid solution for 30 minutes and inserting specific gene sequences back into the cell. The process astonished scientists just last month by successfully turning mice blood cells into stem cells, allowing scientists to then turn those newly-created stem cells into actual mouse embryos, demonstrating that the stem cells truly were pluripotent. The same process has now been successfully used to create human stem cells as well.
Pluripotent stem cells, which have the ability to reproduce indefinitely as well as be transformed into any other type of tissue, have long been proposed to be a potential cure for any number of conditions and diseases, from diabetes to spinal cord injuries. Ethical concerns have previously haunted research proposals, however, as most stem cells, previously, were derived from either from human embryos and required killing the embryo in the process of retrieving the cells, or from the tissue of aborted fetuses. Concerns reached epic proportions when scientists announced just this past May that they had successfully cloned the first human embryos, literally bringing life to pro-life advocate’s fears of scientists creating human beings for the purpose of medical research.
http://liveactionnews.org/researcher...an-skin-cells/
Another one for the naysayers. They don't seem to get this part every time they say 20 years away..
Under the new legislation, if small Phase I/II clinical studies can establish product safety and provide a meaningful indication of therapeutic effectiveness, accelerated approval becomes a possibility – in qualifying situations the government will grant conditional approval to commercialize the product. At that point, a post-market surveillance period will be in effect to more thoroughly delineate safety and efficacy profiles, with subsequent final approval granted at a later date, or alternatively, the potential of revocation of the approval if data shows the therapy to be inefficacious or unsafe.
If the new policy can lead to new therapeutics being available and shave the regulatory route from seven-to-ten years down to only two or three years without sacrificing safety, Abe's plan could prove transformational on multiple fronts.
http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/com...150000280.html
-
Bad News...?
Originally Posted by Desmond84
Well guys, all the naysayers last month were claiming this was another mice study and simply dipping human cells in acid will not yield stem cells! Well, to the surprise of many scientists, this simple and incredibly cheap technique (less than $100) has just shown to work in humans...We have managed to reduce the cost 100 fold in less than 3 years now that's exciting. Prepare yourself for a revolution in biotechnology and regenerative medicine
Researchers herald greatest medical breakthrough of the age, deriving stem cells from human skin cells
Scientists are heralding a massive breakthrough in stem cell research today, after a team of American and Japanese researchers announced yesterday that they had succeeded in turning human skin cells into fully pluripotent stem cells, a move many have said may be the greatest medical breakthrough of recent times.
The technique involved an incredibly simple process of bathing the human skin cells in a weak citric acid solution for 30 minutes and inserting specific gene sequences back into the cell. The process astonished scientists just last month by successfully turning mice blood cells into stem cells, allowing scientists to then turn those newly-created stem cells into actual mouse embryos, demonstrating that the stem cells truly were pluripotent. The same process has now been successfully used to create human stem cells as well.
Pluripotent stem cells, which have the ability to reproduce indefinitely as well as be transformed into any other type of tissue, have long been proposed to be a potential cure for any number of conditions and diseases, from diabetes to spinal cord injuries. Ethical concerns have previously haunted research proposals, however, as most stem cells, previously, were derived from either from human embryos and required killing the embryo in the process of retrieving the cells, or from the tissue of aborted fetuses. Concerns reached epic proportions when scientists announced just this past May that they had successfully cloned the first human embryos, literally bringing life to pro-life advocate’s fears of scientists creating human beings for the purpose of medical research.
http://liveactionnews.org/researcher...an-skin-cells/
Scientists Struggle to Replicate Stem-Cell Research Breakthrough
New Approach Called Into Question
Scientists say they are struggling to replicate a new approach for creating stem cells, raising further questions about the breakthrough technique whose announcement garnered international attention.
The experiments have come under increased scrutiny after Japan's Riken research institute opened an investigation last week into whether there were any irregularities in images used in two papers describing the stem-cell technique. Several laboratories now report that their initial efforts to replicate the experiments have failed.
"We tried it on human cells and so far it hasn't worked," said Jeanne Loring, director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif. "That's consistent with what other people have found" in their initial efforts to replicate the experiments, she added.
[Continues]
The rest is here: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...rss_Technology
-
Originally Posted by Thinning87
Scientists Struggle to Replicate Stem-Cell Research Breakthrough
New Approach Called Into Question
Scientists say they are struggling to replicate a new approach for creating stem cells, raising further questions about the breakthrough technique whose announcement garnered international attention.
The experiments have come under increased scrutiny after Japan's Riken research institute opened an investigation last week into whether there were any irregularities in images used in two papers describing the stem-cell technique. Several laboratories now report that their initial efforts to replicate the experiments have failed.
"We tried it on human cells and so far it hasn't worked," said Jeanne Loring, director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif. "That's consistent with what other people have found" in their initial efforts to replicate the experiments, she added.
[Continues]
The rest is here: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...rss_Technology
It was easy to see that coming
The guy that lead all of it already has a bad track record, and apparently doesn't even have a PhD and tends to see himself as a champion in the middle of evil evidence-backed medicine
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by bigentries
The guy that lead all of it already has a bad track record, and apparently doesn't even have a PhD and tends to see himself as a champion in the middle of evil evidence-backed medicine
Thanks, didn't know Nigam was involved here
Similar Threads
-
By ANW in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 19
Last Post: 08-16-2013, 08:48 AM
-
By PayDay in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 2
Last Post: 04-20-2012, 01:55 PM
-
By NeedHairASAP in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 24
Last Post: 01-18-2012, 10:41 AM
-
By Spex in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 5
Last Post: 01-14-2011, 11:56 AM
-
By Westonci in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 03-31-2010, 05:37 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks