Thread: a documented case of the 9 procedures= 13.000 grafts in HASCI would solve everything

Hst is an illusion.
Calculate how many hairs would fue doctor be able to get by splittin grafts before theres visible depletion? Assuming no hair regen takes place

That your first research turned out to be worthless, that I understand. You simply didn't know about failed extractions and that a lot of FU's grow back with less hair than they originally had. But that you do it again, THAT I do not understand. You're not looking at recipient and you're not taking into consideration that a lot of FU's grow back with less hair. What you've done here is useless, cause we can't draw any conclusions at all regarding regeneration. It's widely accepted among the critics nowadays that hasci splits grafts. So if they'd do that perfectly, in your case you'd come to the conclusion that 100% of the FU grew back and you'd say LOOK 100% REGROWTH (in bold and red font, lol). But if the FU's grow back only with half of the hair and recipient contains the other half, then that's exactly 0 regrowth.

The ONLY possible way to draw valid conclusions is via a 50 graft test.

Originally Posted by Arashi

You simply didn't know about failed extractions ...

Ah, really??

Actually, YOU should tell me and calculate my personal failed extraction ratio ...

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=229

But because I could see that you was always so busy with just tolling, he he and smilie posts everywhere, I simply did it myself. But feel free to review my calculated failed extraction ratio. If you can find more than 2200 extraction holes for the 1400 grafts from the 1st HST - please let me know.

Originally Posted by 534623

Ah, really??

Actually, YOU should tell me and calculate my personal failed extraction ratio ...

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=229

But because I could see that you was always so busy with just tolling, he he and smilie posts everywhere, I simply did it myself. But feel free to review my calculated failed extraction ratio. If you can find more than 2200 extraction holes for the 1400 grafts from the 1st HST - please let me know.

Who cares ? It's not going to prove anything at all. I find it quite amazing that after all this time you still don't seem to get it. While it's really easy to understand actually. If you want to know anything about regrowth, you should know three things:

1) How many hairs (not FU's) were there in the donor before the surgery
2) How many hairs (not FU's) are there in the donor after the surgery
3) How many hairs (not FU's) were gained in recipient.

If any of those 3 fail, it's impossible to come up with a meaningful number. And in your case, number 1 AND 3 fail.

Also, you keep talking about FU's, something which is totally meaningless and irrelevant with HST (since Gho seems to split grafts). 80% FU regrowth might equal 20% hair loss.

Again, that's why a 50 graft test is the only way to finally get to the bottom of this. Something you, for obvious reasons, don't want to take place. And HASCI doesn't seem too eager neither, still trying to arrange for it but after 2 months of my first request (!!) I still can't say if they're going to do it ... My prediction was they were going to try to stall, stall and stall and in the end come up with some BS reason why they can't do it. That first part already is happening ...

How many years has Dr. Gho had to show a 9 session patient to validate his claims?

How many more years will it be before he either proves his technique or we dismiss him completely?

Originally Posted by hellouser

How many years has Dr. Gho had to show a 9 session patient to validate his claims?

The time it took to perform the 9 sessions: around 5 minutes or so.

Originally Posted by hellouser

How many more years will it be before he either proves his technique or we dismiss him completely?

With "we" I guess you mean jobless guys like you who would immediately spend >60k euros for a full head of hair with his HST technique, provided of course, if he can prove his technique - right?

I think you should rather dismiss him immediately & completely ...

Originally Posted by ss1980

Hst is an illusion.

Seems you like illusions, because you posted practically all your 26 newbie posts in the illusion forum ...lol