-
-
There is no NW0. The scale starts at 1.
-
I honestly think Reagan's hair looks ridiculous. I truly believe that a thick NW1 on a man in his 70s looks unnatural.
-
i love it. "if someone was bald he'd lose his signature look." But obviously if he was bald his "signature look" would be bald. I guess it depends, are you saying he lost his hair as this look was established or lost his hair before he had an established look.
But that's all semantics. I don't think it looks strange, just out of place. Which I guess can be described as strange, strange is a very ambiguous term. Strange could be also out of the norm. So I'll settle with my final definition as out of the norm.
And sorry if this came off abrasive or too direct, just a bit tired. Also everyone whines a lot over semantics. But that's not you, just seems to be the theme this week on the forum. So I'm possibly just in an annoyed mood.
-
This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).
-
Having a full head of hair doesn't look ridiculous. Yes, it's not common for a guy that old to have hair that thick, but do you think he or anyone else would choose balding?
-
Originally Posted by BigThinker
This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).
+ 1
-
Originally Posted by BigThinker
This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).
Everyone looks better with a good set of hair.
So your point is flawed.
-
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
I honestly think Reagan's hair looks ridiculous. I truly believe that a thick NW1 on a man in his 70s looks unnatural.
Reagans hair look so good, you wish!
-
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
David Lynch:
Imagine if he was bald, he would lose his signature look.
Ronald Raegen:
Handsome.
Yes, just yes. This is exactly what I am talking about. Over the holidays I was with a lot of family and I noticed how two of my uncles have the hairlines of men who are in their twenties. Both are in their early 60s at this point. It reminded me of everything I had been reading over the years in reference to hair transplants and how all the doctors keep saying how look older men look strange without a high, receded hairline. And I said to myself, "No, they don't strange at all. They look flipping fantastic. Their hair makes them look much younger than they are."
My guess is that this line of thinking is a good way for doctors to convince men to be a little more conservative with their supply of hair without them knowing it. Especially if they don't have a huge supply to begin with. And now it has just become the norm and nobody questions it. I think, if I end up getting surgery, I will go with the most youthful hairline that my doctor says my hair supply will support long term.
I am totally fine looking strange to others if every morning I get up and look in the mirror and say, "Hell, yeah. I love my hair."
Similar Threads
-
By Lounk61 in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 10
Last Post: 10-03-2016, 04:45 PM
-
By Jcm800 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 29
Last Post: 06-05-2013, 05:32 AM
-
By mpb47 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 8
Last Post: 06-12-2012, 05:00 PM
-
By john2399 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 2
Last Post: 04-23-2012, 10:15 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks