-
You might be right I dont know if there is a NW 0 or not I guess you could argue some hair loss is shown on the NW 1 picture in that chart? Those charts are not that accurate or great depending on what one you look at or how the pictures are drawn or use real life pictures.
-
Forum users came up w/ "NW0" because some feel that the NW1 sketch shows minor recession. As I have said before....this chart should not be taken as gospel. it is a bunch of rough sketches done many years ago. All that matters is, are you losing hair or not? If yes then how far are you from when you had no hair loss?
-
Originally Posted by 25 going on 65
Forum users came up w/ "NW0" because some feel that the NW1 sketch shows minor recession. As I have said before....this chart should not be taken as gospel. it is a bunch of rough sketches done many years ago. All that matters is, are you losing hair or not? If yes then how far are you from when you had no hair loss?
Good point. However if a HT surgeon says he will restore you to a NW2, does that mean the appearance of a somewhat normal hairline in a 25+ years of age male, or would most HT's be limited to crappy hairlines with widows peaks?
-
Originally Posted by Dav7
Good point. However if a HT surgeon says he will restore you to a NW2, does that mean the appearance of a somewhat normal hairline in a 25+ years of age male, or would most HT's be limited to crappy hairlines with widows peaks?
Depends on the surgeon & surgery. Most HT's I feel the hairline is too high or the temples are not restored enough. However I understand why they do this because grafts are limited
You can ask him to show you what he means by NW2. Ask him to draw the line on your forehead, or at least on a pic of you
-
You seem to have the issue with this not him
Originally Posted by Tracy C
You will never get get over it if you continue to insist so belligerently on being so dead wrong about it. Barking at me IS NOT going to change reality. It is what it is and it is not going to change just because you refuse to accept it.
What does this even mean? First of all it does not happen to all men, try for instance James Brolin
https://www.google.com/search?q=jame...2F%3B280%3B350
This is like telling every woman who wants perky breast, less forehead wrinkles, tighter tummy that they just shouldn't do it because it isn't natural.
CLEARLY HTS are best and IMHO ONLY good if the temple points are fixed. The HTS I see with receded temple points that go straight up and then a straight across hairline look like what they are; hair transplants no matter how 'good' the work is. I'd opt for not going lower and or slightly less density to get the temples fixed. And no, it wouldn't make me look 'transgender', it would make my ht look natural and me look younger. Clearly YOU have some issue with that.
-
Ginobli TG?
-
Do super low hairlines and super thick head of hair count as an arugment against temple points? Heck if any Doctors could turn NW4 on to that no one would be discussing temple points
-
Senior Member
-
Doctor Representative
Similar Threads
-
By drmwamba in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 1
Last Post: 05-13-2013, 01:00 PM
-
By NeedHairASAP in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 07-04-2012, 12:03 AM
-
By Janna in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 0
Last Post: 05-10-2011, 02:14 PM
-
By uncjim in forum Hair Transplant Veterans
Replies: 5
Last Post: 04-30-2009, 09:09 AM
-
By Bubba in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 5
Last Post: 04-20-2009, 10:29 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks