-
Originally Posted by didi
300cm2..no way.. average NW6 is 200-250 cm2. he was nowhere near NW6.Think Thane.
IMO his bald area was 10cm x 10cm in the worst case scenario, that's 100cm2 and he should have 4500 FUs growing in this area...that's 45 grafts per cm2...
This is more like it. I will confirm later.
-
Senior Member
GCs bald area was about 80-90cm2. 9cm x 9-10cm.
-
I'll tell you how I know, because the hair piece I wore was 10cm diameter and the hair piece slightly covers the areas with hair.
Admittedly they have put about 700 in the front area which wasn't in the original 100cm2 area. I suppose a few hundred have been lost on the edges, because I asked them to increase the density on the edges to give the appearance of a more natural smooth result, hopefully you follow me there with that.
Also it's worth pointing out that in HST 4, they didn't put any grafts at all in the middle back area. They did the front area, near forelock, about 2 inches back from forelock, all the edges, the front (hairline area) and the also concentrated on the very top-back where there was virtually no hair.
So the area with that Red square 'i think' has only had one pass, which would have been HST 3. You can probably verify from an after HST 4 photo where the grafts were implanted, I'll have to check and see if I have one showing it.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by gc83uk
This is more like it. I will confirm later.
I said AT BEST, Gaz Also that red spot that I painted is really bigger than a square cm. Just making my point, that you need AT BEST (but more probably even less) than 1800 FUE grafts to get your result. Just my point that the results don't look like regrowth at all to me. You'd have depleted your donor, like it is now. And you'd have some basic coverage, like you have now. Just looks like a normal FUE result to me.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by 534623
If your point is that some FUE can really butcher up your donor and leave huge scars: I totally agree. That's why I think HST is still the best we have. But there's just no evidence at all of any regrowth, quite the contrary in fact. All evidence points us to none to very little regrowth.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
I said AT BEST, Gaz Also that red spot that I painted is really bigger than a square cm. Just making my point, that you need AT BEST (but more probably even less) than 1800 FUE grafts to get your result. Just my point that the results don't look like regrowth at all to me. You'd have depleted your donor, like it is now. And you'd have some basic coverage, like you have now. Just looks like a normal FUE result to me.
You said 300 at best, I'm telling you straight that it's nowhere near 300. I'm not referring to anything else.
-
Senior Member
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
I believe you man Just didnt want to underestimate it and have the discussion with people that they though I underestimated it I was just pointing out a best case scenario.
lol ok
-
Senior Member
Now things look even worse, 15 grafts/cm2 and theres was 100cm2 bald spot,suggests many grafts didn't grow.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
I said AT BEST, Gaz Also that red spot that I painted is really bigger than a square cm.
I'm pretty sure the red square here is closer to 0.5 to 0.75 of a cm.
Similar Threads
-
By Dr. Robert J. Dorin in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 2
Last Post: 01-04-2014, 06:44 AM
-
By qaz246 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 13
Last Post: 06-26-2013, 08:10 AM
-
By c5000 in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 68
Last Post: 02-23-2013, 09:49 AM
-
By sanook in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 15
Last Post: 12-09-2012, 07:47 PM
-
By Janna in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 0
Last Post: 01-26-2011, 09:15 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks