-
 Originally Posted by hiilikeyourbeard
isn't it safe to say that if nigam is right about what he has disclosed so far, that he will be right about regrowing hair without invasive surgery? he's obviously not messing around, that has been confirmed
Man, I hope this is the case more than anything in this world.
-
sounds like more BS if you ask me. If it really worked then why aren't some of the most famous HT surgeons using it?
-
Senior Member
 Originally Posted by PayDay
It look like it's going to be the same cost as a hair transplant. If you think that this will be too expensive then it's best you spend time working instead of on a forum. All future treatments like these are going to cost good money.
Depends on which 'version' of Follica's treatment ends up being the one that is mass released. If not multiples of them.
-
 Originally Posted by crafter
sounds like more BS if you ask me. If it really worked then why aren't some of the most famous HT surgeons using it?
Because most of them traditionally do not do a damn thing with regards to innovation.
Similar Threads
-
By didi in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 2
Last Post: 09-22-2012, 12:02 PM
-
By lizard5781 in forum Non Surgical Hair Replacement
Replies: 26
Last Post: 01-01-2011, 08:47 AM
-
By Jeffrey Epstein, MD in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 0
Last Post: 06-14-2010, 07:11 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-16-2009, 03:40 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks