-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.
And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.
I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...
Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts
Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:
"well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"
How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?
-
2 weeks? Well this just keeps getting better and better.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:
"well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"
How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?
sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve at least 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.
Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man
Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?
they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
I'm still very interested though
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
I'm still very interested though
It's interesting but it also gets very discouraging. Dr Nigams made it sound like Mwamba would come in and verify his therapy. He didn't. I had hoped he would perform some experiments and tell us in 6 months how they worked out. Well, maybe he did that, but then why post stuff like that 60% (and later remove it) !?!? This Mwamba guy seems to be just like Nigams.
Anyway, let's forget about this. The real proof is in converting a NW7 to a NW1. Dr Nigams promised us he's going to start with 5 NW7's which he's going to turn into NW1's next monday. Let's focus on that, cause that only that could finally yield the proof we all seek.
Similar Threads
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 1341
Last Post: 08-21-2013, 05:07 AM
-
By TO YOUNG TO RETIRE in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 13
Last Post: 07-24-2013, 11:46 AM
-
By TO YOUNG TO RETIRE in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 44
Last Post: 05-23-2013, 08:39 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks