-
I thought the real deal was that he can garantee 100%!!
plus if it is 60% like HASCI pretends 85% why the hell would you give it more credit?
-
Originally Posted by caddarik79
I thought the real deal was that he can garantee 100%!!
plus if it is 60% like HASCI pretends 85% why the hell would you give it more credit?
His consulent has just removed the phrase"at least 60% regrowth", explaining that it can be more than 60% and it's better not to give fixed numbers at the moment, as it's an experimental treatment to be tested in the nearest future.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
His consulent has just removed the phrase"at least 60% regrowth", explaining that it can be more than 60% and it's better not to give fixed numbers at the moment, as it's an experimental treatment to be tested in the nearest future.
But really, tell me, how can he be sure about 60% after just visiting Nigams ? The answer is he can't. He's just speculating.
-
Senior Member
unless dr Nigam presented him with some incredible before/after pics tht blew mwamba away
He might have shown him how its done, protocol etc but he CANT be sure about regeneretion
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by didi
unless dr Nigam presented him with some incredible before/after pics tht blew mwamba away
He might have shown him how its done, protocol etc but he CANT be sure about regeneretion
LOL, Dr Nigams and incredible pics
And yeah, spot on, he can't be sure at all.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
But really, tell me, how can he be sure about 60% after just visiting Nigams ? The answer is he can't. He's just speculating.
well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;
he did not say it can't be 100% in all of his cases, he just gave a pesimistic number, and for that he cancelled that number
I think it wanted to say: if the technique works, my idea is that you all can get a good % of donor regrowth
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by tmw
well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;
he did not say it can't be 100% in all of his cases, he just gave a pesimistic number, and for that he cancelled that number
I think it wanted to say: if the technique works, my idea is that you all can get a good % of donor regrowth
This is supposedly what he said: I can achieve in the future re-growth of at least 60% of the donor used
-
Senior Member
what arashi want to say is that Dr Mwamba couldn't possibly be certain whether regen is happening at all after spending only 2 weeks in India,
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by didi
what arashi want to say is that Dr Mwamba couldn't possibly be certain whether regen is happening at all after spending only 2 weeks in India,
Exactly. In 2 weeks you can't do any experiments. You can just listen to what Dr Nigams promises. And that he can motivate people and promise us the most beatiful things, that we all know by now. But we don't want promises, we want results.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
This is supposedly what he said: I can achieve in the future re-growth of at least 60% of the donor used
No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.
And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.
Similar Threads
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 1341
Last Post: 08-21-2013, 05:07 AM
-
By TO YOUNG TO RETIRE in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 13
Last Post: 07-24-2013, 11:46 AM
-
By TO YOUNG TO RETIRE in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 44
Last Post: 05-23-2013, 08:39 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks