Bio start ups - histogen, follica, Aderans, replicel etc scams?

[yeahyeahyeah]

They tried to tackle a very difficult task and failed at it, why are they supposed to be scams?

If curing baldness was cheap and easy, we would have a product already

To get to the cure we need a lot of failures down the road, that's how life usually works, learning from other people's mistakes

People just have a naively positivity most of the time from any vague news that can be constructed as progress

They have cloned Animals; sent men to the moon; and yet...they can't cure baldness.

What the **** is the world coming too?

[garethbale]

lol.

If a product is good enough, people will invest in it.

5 million is nothing for venture capitalists.

Aderans were either milking their parent company of their cash - only for them to clock on. Or were trying to polish a turd.

Why haven't ARI released their phase 2 results (photographs). Think about it.

When parent companies produce their accounts they are consolidated with their subsidiaries. That is, the accounts are produced as a group set of accounts. There's NO WAY a parent would just allow a subsidiary to just milk it for cash as profits of a subsidiary directly affect those of its parent company.

Also, the board are accountable to shareholders, chosen BY shareholders to act FOR shareholders and must report directly to them. I find it highly doubtful that they could produce this intricate scam to steal profits for 10 plus years without shareholder suspicion being aroused.

I think you are being too much of a conspiracy theorist. Aderans Research was not a scam, it was just unsuccessful.

[UK_]

When parent companies produce their accounts they are consolidated with their subsidiaries. That is, the accounts are produced as a group set of accounts. There's NO WAY a parent would just allow a subsidiary to just milk it for cash as profits of a subsidiary directly affect those of its parent company.

Also, the board are accountable to shareholders, chosen BY shareholders to act FOR shareholders and must report directly to them. I find it highly doubtful that they could produce this intricate scam to steal profits for 10 plus years without shareholder suspicion being aroused.

I think you are being too much of a conspiracy theorist. Aderans Research was not a scam, it was just unsuccessful.

Yep... and Ken is also a NW3.

[Javert]

Histogen is going through two phase II trials, (IIa and IIb). Same rules apply to them in the asian market.

Again though, read my thread on Replicel's DSC cells formation and time required. Theyre valid points from a noobie.

Has Histogen started phase 2 trial(s)?

[UK_]

Has Histogen started phase 2 trial(s)?

They're going to do a large scale animal study before they go into their next human trial.

[yeahyeahyeah]

When parent companies produce their accounts they are consolidated with their subsidiaries. That is, the accounts are produced as a group set of accounts. There's NO WAY a parent would just allow a subsidiary to just milk it for cash as profits of a subsidiary directly affect those of its parent company.

Also, the board are accountable to shareholders, chosen BY shareholders to act FOR shareholders and must report directly to them. I find it highly doubtful that they could produce this intricate scam to steal profits for 10 plus years without shareholder suspicion being aroused.

I think you are being too much of a conspiracy theorist. Aderans Research was not a scam, it was just unsuccessful.

Well, Ken could have said anything to them?

It is not working for x reason (insert technical jargon), but we are working on it. (insert more technical jargon). Or he could have over hyped his results when he did make breakthroughs.

what would the board know?

Edit:

The fact that the board of directors changed, tells me, things wern't managed properly.

[yeahyeahyeah]

They're going to do a large scale animal study before they go into their next human trial.

Why? haven't they proven safety in phase 1.

[garethbale]

Well, Ken could have said anything to them?

It is not working for x reason (insert technical jargon), but we are working on it. (insert more technical jargon). Or he could have over hyped his results when he did make breakthroughs.

what would the board know?

Edit:

The fact that the board of directors changed, tells me, things wern't managed properly.

Boards get changed regularly anyway. And even if they were underperforming, it may have been because of something else. Aderans has many investments, not just ARI

[UK_]

Why? haven't they proven safety in phase 1.

Animals suffer from mpb too you know.

[yeahyeahyeah]

Animals suffer from mpb too you know.

I dont get it.

What do they hope to achieve by doing this?

And where are your sources from?