Saw this link on another thread:
What jumped out at me wasn't so much that Bosley should be avoided, but that many of the criticisms on this page could apply to non-Bosley doctors as well.
Risks of permanent scarring, permanent shock loss, limited donor hair, "illusion of hair", you're better off waiting for future treatments, and so on.
This reads more like an indictment of FUT than Bosley (though there are specifics criticisms of Bosley here).
After going through the page, my thoughts weren't so much "don't go to Bosley" as they were: "never *ever* get FUT".
Thoughts?
What jumped out at me wasn't so much that Bosley should be avoided, but that many of the criticisms on this page could apply to non-Bosley doctors as well.
Risks of permanent scarring, permanent shock loss, limited donor hair, "illusion of hair", you're better off waiting for future treatments, and so on.
This reads more like an indictment of FUT than Bosley (though there are specifics criticisms of Bosley here).
After going through the page, my thoughts weren't so much "don't go to Bosley" as they were: "never *ever* get FUT".
Thoughts?
Comment