CG 210 w/ link to before/after pics

[KO1]

Truth.

Didn't Keratene run a clinical trial though?

It should be on www.clinicaltrials.gov or www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu If it is not there or the study results are not posted, then we can't buy into the hype.

[hairandthere]

It's a Swiss company which I believe manufactures in France. They presented at the World Hair Congress and were brought up in the thread for the Congress on this forum as well as here: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=10889 . Not sure I believe the pics posted on *** but it seems like it may improve conditions for regrowth.

[doke]

what about minox with cg210 as i have four bottles of the product which i stopped using because of the onion smell.

[thechamp]

what about minox with cg210 as i have four bottles of the product which i stopped using because of the onion smell.

Doke you have 4 bottles of cg210 ?? Us balding guys are desperate uu

[BoSox]

Pictures look the same to me. Not really that impressive.

[sausage]

Pictures look the same to me. Not really that impressive.

Thank god someone thinks the same as me....

I saw the pics and was like 'where's the new growth'. There is no difference. In some photos the before hair is wet and then the after photo is dry.

Why are people like 'wow, this is amazing' HUH ! What u guys looking at?

[Conpecia]

I think this is BS to be honest, after doing some more research the guy seems like a shill.

[hairandthere]

Here is a pdf a user at *** posted. He claims that it was sent to him by Legacy Healthcare (the manufacturer of cg210):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/126556369/ACEBA-3-English

It looks to have taken place in Brazil and they do thank Legacy Healthcare at the end of it for providing the cg210 needed for the study...

[Conpecia]

that's a very detailed study. but why don't they do hair counts? why do they just finish it saying people were satisfied with the product? it's like they do all this other in depth science and bail out where it really matters.

[habemus]

that's a very detailed study. but why don't they do hair counts? why do they just finish it saying people were satisfied with the product? it's like they do all this other in depth science and bail out where it really matters.

Why so many questions about my result?
My photo BEFORE clearly shows that had regrowth with CG 210. I have 4 months of use and a few days and I am satisfied.

Att,