-
The thing is that we don't even know if Biologixhair has a product. All we know is that there is a website that claims to have a cure for baldness.
I don't mean to quibble, but looking at their website it seemed that they were treating people with some kind of injectable, which would suggest a product as opposed to something that is merely a procedure.
A well-respected hair loss expert like Ziering is involved and yet the website mentions crap like traditional Chinese medicine. Why have they made no effort to engage the hair loss community? This whole thing is just so bizarre...
-
Snake oil...just because Ziering is involved does not give it legitimacy. Ziering is just another HT surgeon. If Colin Jahoda or Ken Washenik or George Cotsarelis were involved, I would pay attention.
They need to demonstrate what the science is behind their treatment, and then we can seriously consider them. Selling snake oil to bald men continues to this day.
-
We have every right to be cautious, skeptic.
But we should also remain open minded in the face of evidence. Not so much that our brains fall out, mind you.
-
Shouldnt we find evidence first before becoming optimistic? We've seen no independent clinical data on this, but we're still discussing this for 9 pages.
-
I agree with you.
We'll just wait it out until.
Similar Threads
-
By caddarik79 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 06-17-2013, 11:30 AM
-
By yeahyeahyeah in forum Hair Loss Rants
Replies: 4
Last Post: 01-24-2013, 06:13 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 0
Last Post: 10-08-2012, 10:30 AM
-
By thejack in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 4
Last Post: 11-16-2010, 02:46 PM
-
By gmonasco in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 04-20-2010, 06:28 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks