Poll: What do you think of Hasci and their HST?

[cocacola]

Didi is a broken record, repeats the same shit in every post about hst. We know its not perfect, and there are things to be answered, but do you have something else to offer other than your trolling?

[LT56]

Ah shit, guys. Don't do this to me. I've been growing my hair long for 4 months and will be blowing $12k on HST in September. I'm a NW2.5, so I'm not super concerned with re-generation; as long as it's say 50% or more I'd be happy. The permanence is more important to me, so please tell me you don't think the hair will disappear in 20 years.

[Arashi]

Nobody thinks HSt is 'totally legit'??, even hasci patients/cheerleaders or ex fanboys are still unconvinced.
That is very disappointing.

You are really starting to get boring Didi. Voting the 'totally legit' option is as stupid as voting the 'totally unconvinced' option. If you vote any of those options you really haven't looked at the evidence or used your brain.

HST clearly is the best thing out there. It's totally scarless and donor regeneration happens to a certain extend. How far exactly, that yet remains to be seen, but all evidence seems to be pointing to about 50%. But we really need more evidence/info to get a good estimate.

[caddarik79]

I had Deborah by email and she maintains the 80-85% is for sure.
they know there will always be skeptical people.

I think our biggest point is, when can we have an "improved" HST, or HST 3.0 or this famous 1 hair becomes 10.

I am also waiting for Nigam's results, and Mousseigne documentation and prices.

But yes, today, HST and Gho are the best and only option, let's f*ck everything else...

Let's not let continue with the two very known treatments, hold money for better, don't make pharmacy become rich with non-result + side effects products.

[Arashi]

I had Deborah by email and she maintains the 80-85% is for sure.
they know there will always be skeptical people.

That's something Kristel said too. It's like saying 'there's no sense in proving our technique, cause there will always be skeptical people'. I highly disagree. Well, sure, there WILL always be skeptical people. But right now, NOBODY is 100% convinced in the 80-85% regrowth. Ok there's Ironman ..

[Skywalker]

That's something Kristel said too. It's like saying 'there's no sense in proving our technique, cause there will always be skeptical people'. I highly disagree. Well, sure, there WILL always be skeptical people. But right now, NOBODY is 100% convinced in the 80-85% regrowth. Ok there's Ironman ..

I too strongly disagree, they said they would document the 50 graft test and they haven't done it - that really isn't good enough

[Phatalis]

I don't get this poll.

Is it asking if I'm convinced there's 80% regrowth? Cause no I don't.

But regardless it's one of the only options for scar free operation. So I mean, regardless of regrowth it's still better than everything else.

[Dees Dab]

Ah shit, guys. Don't do this to me. I've been growing my hair long for 4 months and will be blowing $12k on HST in September. I'm a NW2.5, so I'm not super concerned with re-generation; as long as it's say 50% or more I'd be happy. The permanence is more important to me, so please tell me you don't think the hair will disappear in 20 years.

I beleive Kristel said you should have your newly transplanted hair for life.

Plus there should be some improvements allegedly coming within the next 5-10 years so not to worry.

I'm thinking some time next year myself. Are you growing your hair to cover the shaved part? Will you be taking close up pics to check regeneration rate etc?

[greatjob!]

You are really starting to get boring Didi. Voting the 'totally legit' option is as stupid as voting the 'totally unconvinced' option. If you vote any of those options you really haven't looked at the evidence or used your brain.

HST clearly is the best thing out there. It's totally scarless and donor regeneration happens to a certain extend. How far exactly, that yet remains to be seen, but all evidence seems to be pointing to about 50%. But we really need more evidence/info to get a good estimate.

I thought internet polls where the same thing as scientific proof

What I don't understand is how you can get 85% donor regeneration and still max out the donor supply of Dean Saunders at 5100 grafts. Just doesn't make mathematical sense.

[gc83uk]

I thought internet polls where the same thing as scientific proof

What I don't understand is how you can get 85% donor regeneration and still max out the donor supply of Dean Saunders at 5100 grafts. Just doesn't make mathematical sense.

His donor supply hasn't been maxed out though. He was offered 3 x free procedures. I actually suspect he will go back for more at his own cost next time.

What you have probably have read is the 'general advice' that you will begin to see some thinning after having 3 HST's.

Hasci are overly cautious imo.