With many people disappointed with recent results of companies like Histogen and Aderans, I keep coming back to the same article that I've posted a few times here: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=a6OdEa5VFNV8.
In this study, hair multiplication was achieved and the hair regrowth results were phenomenal. Although this study was performed on children with alopecia areata, the methodology that this doctor used could also very well be applied to people with male pattern baldness. I mean, she extracted a small biopsy of a hair-bearing area of the scalp, multiplied the stem cells in culture, and then re-injected them into the bald areas of the childrens' scalps with phenomenal results.
This study was actually able to achieve what companies like Aderans, Histogen, and Replicel were not, yet this study seems to be completely ignored by the hair loss industry.
Hey Desmond my bro, what do you think of this study?
In this study, hair multiplication was achieved and the hair regrowth results were phenomenal. Although this study was performed on children with alopecia areata, the methodology that this doctor used could also very well be applied to people with male pattern baldness. I mean, she extracted a small biopsy of a hair-bearing area of the scalp, multiplied the stem cells in culture, and then re-injected them into the bald areas of the childrens' scalps with phenomenal results.
This study was actually able to achieve what companies like Aderans, Histogen, and Replicel were not, yet this study seems to be completely ignored by the hair loss industry.
Hey Desmond my bro, what do you think of this study?
Comment