-
lol. yah that guy is NOT a NW7. Not even close.
-
Senior Member
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
And also very important: where are the pre-op macro photos ? You must know by now how much we need those, right ?
This is the most important comment in this thread so far.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by clandestine
This is the most important comment in this thread so far.
The fact that he's using a NW3 patient and tells us that it's a NW7 and him posting photo's of the future are more important to me, but ok.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
The fact that he's using a NW3 patient and tells us that it's a NW7 and him posting photo's of the future are more important to me, but ok.
Baby steps.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by clandestine
Baby steps.
Hehe. This is hilarious
-
Sure ironman tomorrow.
Originally Posted by 534623
Oh, really?
Can you please show us a photo of these partial follicular units which you extracted with a 0.6 mm hollow needle?
-
Date correction 1) 2pics show day 3 it should be day1 2)day 0 was 10th april and day 1 is today 11th april
Green dots show donor regen on day1 as we do not go deep but only 1mm to loosen the graft and than pluck the parial graft.
more Pre op pics ,i will post tmr as we just finished today's procedure
I know we need to count the donor extractions,recipient incisions,singles /doubles.
Don't worry arashi..wait for tmr pics ...you are not the only person on forum ,so that i cannot post few pics tonight and rest day1 pics tmr.
Originally Posted by Arashi
I'm confused. Why does it say day 3 in the thumbnails ? And what do the green dots depict ? And how is this patient a NW7 ? Seems like a NW3 to me ?
-
clandestine,
will post preop macro and videomicroscopic pis tmr..just finished his today's procedure ..was getting late for staff.
Originally Posted by clandestine
This is the most important comment in this thread so far.
-
Arashi,
i know you are frustrated after the 200graft test on your demand..just read that thread.
1)500donor extraction marks singles/doubles/triples and claiming 200 graft donor extraction test.500 drills for 200 extraction..wow
2)no longitudnal bisection of a follicle
3)funny claim of telogen follicles
4)huge number of transected follicles
5) wastage of 50 grafts
6)where did the effect of preservation medium for follicular multiplication dissappeared.
7)where were stemcells extracted or atomized and implanted.
8)Extraction of grafts with bulb like normal FUE..the partial FUE and you claim stemcell hair transplant.
you have lost all my credibilty...i am not going anywhere....watch for the space...all cases of mine are not test patch with 100% documentation...do your markings and document yourself.
When i do patch test ..i will inform and do the documentation ..like the 15 graft test.
Similar Threads
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 398
Last Post: 05-24-2013, 04:52 PM
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 48
Last Post: 04-29-2013, 06:42 PM
-
By 534623 in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 87
Last Post: 03-30-2013, 03:04 AM
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 41
Last Post: 03-25-2013, 08:28 AM
-
By drnigams in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 1
Last Post: 03-25-2013, 08:15 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks