+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by didi View Post
    still a big JOKE...

    Even Dr Woods have more impressive gallery..
    I agree.

    It's hard to take Dr Gho seriously as a person who cares about us if he's not going to share his technique with us.

    If it wasn't for Dr Woods Dr Gho wouldn't have had FUE to go by - and on that basis he should share his technique for the greater good.

    That said the site is 100x easier to use.

  2. #12
    Senior Member didi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,372

    Default

    Im not saying dr Woods is an angel, he didnt wanna share his FUE, he wanted 100k for training and industry said 'No',
    Spencer helped him a lot just like he is helping Gho

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    495

    Default

    I love the part about hair multiplication, looks like they are working on it, this will be the next step, the cure, the huge "shut up" to the rest of the industry...

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,816

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garethbale View Post
    The results still don't look dense enough. I like the quick healing and lack of scarring but I'm not sure I'd go to Gho for a hairline treatment.
    Yeah, disappointing.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,105

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah View Post
    Yeah, disappointing.
    I think it's the same for all HT docs mate.

    You can't make 4000 hairs look like your original density of a hundred thousand hairs.

    So in the sense that you've only got limited donor, and if Gho does have it so donor regenerates then you'd be mad to get a normal HT.

    If only all docs used the Gho technique and he freely shared this technique - it'd be a better world for all of us right now.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Breaking Bald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    At wits end...
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah View Post
    Yeah, disappointing.
    +1

    Crappy results

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    I have held my tongue on this for awhile, but the more time goes on, the more I am disappointed that they still do not have any cosmetically impressive results

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    605

    Default

    They have a very small range of results and none are particularly impressive.

    If they pluck part of the hair and leave part intact, then presumably they can harvest the same area again. Logic states that this would mean results with excellent coverage and good density (at least twice as good as tradional HTs), yet the pictures show small areas that have been treated and don't look any more dense (probably less dense) than traditional HT results.

    I don't get it. I am convinced about the lack of scarring and quick healing but far from convinced on the results. Wesley Sneijder is the only one I'm impressed with.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,816

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi View Post
    I think it's the same for all HT docs mate.

    You can't make 4000 hairs look like your original density of a hundred thousand hairs.

    So in the sense that you've only got limited donor, and if Gho does have it so donor regenerates then you'd be mad to get a normal HT.

    If only all docs used the Gho technique and he freely shared this technique - it'd be a better world for all of us right now.
    Go to Rahal's web site and look at his results.

    Heck - look at Spex's results.

    Either I am severely mislead, or you can do it.

    These guys after a HT, still look like they are balding.

  10. #20
    Senior Member Arashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,888

    Default

    That whole photo section on the site is pretty worthless IMHO. Without knowing how many grafts were transplanted, how can you even judge any of those pictures ? Some of the pictures would be simply stunning if the patient got 600 grafts, but would be really disappointing if if were 6000.

Similar Threads

  1. Hasci (Gho) patient with videos
    By RichardDawkins in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
    Replies: 177
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 06:06 AM
  2. gc83uk - Hasci sept to march
    By gc83uk in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-01-2012, 10:10 PM
  3. Is HASCI for real?
    By didi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 260
    Last Post: 03-20-2012, 07:32 AM
  4. Tim Akkerman after 1 year of HASCI
    By elvispresley in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-18-2012, 12:55 AM
  5. Why no complaints about HASCI/ Gho till today
    By RichardDawkins in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-15-2012, 12:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
Today 11:39 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 10:12 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
Today 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Today 07:24 AM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
04-17-2024 08:34 AM