-
Originally Posted by didi
still a big JOKE...
Even Dr Woods have more impressive gallery..
I agree.
It's hard to take Dr Gho seriously as a person who cares about us if he's not going to share his technique with us.
If it wasn't for Dr Woods Dr Gho wouldn't have had FUE to go by - and on that basis he should share his technique for the greater good.
That said the site is 100x easier to use.
-
Senior Member
Im not saying dr Woods is an angel, he didnt wanna share his FUE, he wanted 100k for training and industry said 'No',
Spencer helped him a lot just like he is helping Gho
-
I love the part about hair multiplication, looks like they are working on it, this will be the next step, the cure, the huge "shut up" to the rest of the industry...
-
Originally Posted by garethbale
The results still don't look dense enough. I like the quick healing and lack of scarring but I'm not sure I'd go to Gho for a hairline treatment.
Yeah, disappointing.
-
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
Yeah, disappointing.
I think it's the same for all HT docs mate.
You can't make 4000 hairs look like your original density of a hundred thousand hairs.
So in the sense that you've only got limited donor, and if Gho does have it so donor regenerates then you'd be mad to get a normal HT.
If only all docs used the Gho technique and he freely shared this technique - it'd be a better world for all of us right now.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
Yeah, disappointing.
+1
Crappy results
-
I have held my tongue on this for awhile, but the more time goes on, the more I am disappointed that they still do not have any cosmetically impressive results
-
They have a very small range of results and none are particularly impressive.
If they pluck part of the hair and leave part intact, then presumably they can harvest the same area again. Logic states that this would mean results with excellent coverage and good density (at least twice as good as tradional HTs), yet the pictures show small areas that have been treated and don't look any more dense (probably less dense) than traditional HT results.
I don't get it. I am convinced about the lack of scarring and quick healing but far from convinced on the results. Wesley Sneijder is the only one I'm impressed with.
-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
I think it's the same for all HT docs mate.
You can't make 4000 hairs look like your original density of a hundred thousand hairs.
So in the sense that you've only got limited donor, and if Gho does have it so donor regenerates then you'd be mad to get a normal HT.
If only all docs used the Gho technique and he freely shared this technique - it'd be a better world for all of us right now.
Go to Rahal's web site and look at his results.
Heck - look at Spex's results.
Either I am severely mislead, or you can do it.
These guys after a HT, still look like they are balding.
-
Senior Member
That whole photo section on the site is pretty worthless IMHO. Without knowing how many grafts were transplanted, how can you even judge any of those pictures ? Some of the pictures would be simply stunning if the patient got 600 grafts, but would be really disappointing if if were 6000.
Similar Threads
-
By RichardDawkins in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 177
Last Post: 02-19-2013, 06:06 AM
-
By gc83uk in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 26
Last Post: 07-01-2012, 10:10 PM
-
By didi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 260
Last Post: 03-20-2012, 07:32 AM
-
By elvispresley in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 18
Last Post: 03-18-2012, 12:55 AM
-
By RichardDawkins in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 30
Last Post: 03-15-2012, 12:17 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks