50 grafts patch test in Vitro Hair Doubling as requested by GC @Dr. Nigam's

[drnigams]

Dear Friends,

As requested by GC and few others at TBT presenting before picture taken today 28th March 2013, for 50 graft patch test for in Vitro donor doubling on this MPB case. GC has also requested the same from HST and want to compare the two technique regarding the donor and recipient regeneration.

Any other modification required in this case study, feel free to communicate to me.

Hope GC will do the independent documentation and digital follow up of donor and recipient growth.

Below are the before pictures for tomorrows 50 grafts patch test including one short video. 6 tattoos have been made on the recipient and 6 tattoos have been made on the donor shaved scalp.

As requested by GC and others we will take out mostly triplets and double grafts.

Tomorrow i.e., 29th March 2013, we will post the Day 0 pictures.


Links for the pictures

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/01.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/02.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/03.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/04.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/05.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/06.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/07.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/08.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/09.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/10.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/11.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/12.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/13.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/14.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/15.jpg

Video link

http://youtu.be/78QDCNGQ2lc

[youngin]

Thanks Dr. Nigam.

[534623]

... to compare the two technique regarding the donor and recipient regeneration.

Sorry, but there is absolutely nothing to compare, because besides your photoshopped photos on your website, you couldn't prove so far not 1 growing hair neither in the donor area nor in the recipient area - not even 1 hair!

btw - I thought you bought a $1000 camera?
It doesn't seems so...
... the (useless) photos rather look like as taken by a cheap mobile phone camera.

[hellouser]

btw - I thought you bought a $1000 camera?
It doesn't seems so...
... the (useless) photos rather look like as taken by a cheap mobile phone camera.

EXIF data on the jpegs provided in the current photos as well as previous show a camera model 'GM-60D'. Most likely a Canon 60D, so yes, about $1000.

And no, they dont look like a cheap mobile phones results.

[cocacola]

way to go nigam, if u want to prove somehting on this forum pics or it didnt happen

[534623]

And no, they dont look like a cheap mobile phones results.

Yeah, you're right - they look like $1000 super-duper high quality photos ...

[hellouser]

Yeah, you're right - they look like $1000 super-duper high quality photos ...

The pictures are fine. All cameras will exhibit noise when using a high ISO, including the 60D, it may have been set to 3200 ISO or higher.

I know youre a total noob when it comes to photography, so this is an area where you should keep quiet.

[PatientlyWaiting]

How come 534623 is allowed to troll on this site continuously? Does this site have no moderator?

[Jasari]

I am highly skeptical of the legitimacy of these treatments but I've been on message boards like these for near on a decade and no doctor has been as open with their treatments.

[JJJJrS]

Yeah, you're right - they look like $1000 super-duper high quality photos ...

The pictures are excellent.

For example, with this picture, if you click and zoom-in, you can count all the hairs very easily and see exactly how many hairs are in each unit.