Is my thinking correct? (Please try to follow my logic) (interactive experience)

[Aames]

Say I were to get my T levels to plummet by not lifting and not eating fat. For the sake of the argument, let's say 50% of baseline. Now, logically, wouldn't this mean that I would have 50% of baseline DHT in my system (ignore DHT blockers at this point and continue following my genius)? Now, add a DHT blocker into the mix and won't hair maintenance/regrowth be enhanced? Please see my maths:
Baseline T (I'm just going to use percentages and not whatever the hell they measure hormones with): 100%
Baseline DHT: 100%
T after plummeting: 50%
DHT after plummeting: 50%

Here is where we add a DHT blocker such as duta (98% inhibition of type 2 5ar)
T after plummeting: 50%
DHT after plummeting and adding DHT blocker: 1%

Compare to if I weren't trying to get my T levels to plummet, but using a DHT blocker
T:100%
DHT: 2%

Conclusion: allowing T to plummet while using a DHT inhibitor means that DHT inhibition increases 100% than if you did not allow T to plummet but used a DHT inhibitor. This is why spiro works in regrowing hair for some people.

Is what I said true or false? Did it even make any sense at all?

Now, I know what a lot of you are thinking, "Wow, why don't you just turn yourself into a girl, you douche. You need strong muscles and such." But, please, let's think about this for a second. Given the choice, we all know which one of the following pictures is more beautiful.

[Kayman]

Say I were to get my T levels to plummet by not lifting and not eating fat. For the sake of the argument, let's say 50% of baseline. Now, logically, wouldn't this mean that I would have 50% of baseline DHT in my system (ignore DHT blockers at this point and continue following my genius)? Now, add a DHT blocker into the mix and won't hair maintenance/regrowth be enhanced? Please see my maths:
Baseline T (I'm just going to use percentages and not whatever the hell they measure hormones with): 100%
Baseline DHT: 100%
T after plummeting: 50%
DHT after plummeting: 50%

Here is where we add a DHT blocker such as duta (98% inhibition of type 2 5ar)
T after plummeting: 50%
DHT after plummeting and adding DHT blocker: 1%

Compare to if I weren't trying to get my T levels to plummet, but using a DHT blocker
T:100%
DHT: 2%

Conclusion: allowing T to plummet while using a DHT inhibitor means that DHT inhibition increases 100% than if you did not allow T to plummet but used a DHT inhibitor. This is why spiro works in regrowing hair for some people.

Is what I said true or false? Did it even make any sense at all?

Now, I know what a lot of you are thinking, "Wow, why don't you just turn yourself into a girl, you douche. You need strong muscles and such." But, please, let's think about this for a second. Given the choice, we all know which one of the following pictures is more beautiful.

I would think the majority of people reading this are probably pulling a face like the guy in the second picture.

[Aames]

I would think the majority of people reading this are probably pulling a face like the guy in the second picture.

Why do you insist on attacking and trolling every post I make? How do your posts go unnoticed by Winston when I get my posts deleted when I am offering sound, educated advice? I feel this is a very valid topic and one that is of great interest to me. I'm looking for any way possible to maintain my hair and if this helps me in my quest to do so, I would like to hear some educated opinions regarding it.

[Davey Jones]

I'd like to disagree only very slightly here. Not everyone knows who the better looking guy there is. It's more like everyone but you.

[Aames]

I'd like to disagree only very slightly here. Not everyone knows who the better looking guy there is. It's more like everyone but you.

I don't think we are understanding each other. I'm not discussing "poon-slaying potential" or which can pick up the most used-up sloots. I'm discussing beauty, aesthetics, etc. Think about it as if you were going to paint or sculpt one. Which would you choose to represent for the ages: a man with nearly perfect hair and facial features, or some NW3 juicer?

[Davey Jones]

nearly perfect hair and facial features

That's just so subjective. I'm not even sure how to argue that. You do realize that what you're talking about is an opinion, right? You act like getting women (or men, if that's your thing) isn't a part of it. What is a perfect appearance if not the most attractive to others?

Think about it as if you were going to paint or sculpt one. Which would you choose to represent for the ages?

Admittedly, I'm pretty partial to Donatello's David, but it's probably just the name thing. If I'm sculpting one myself, it's gonna be this one:

[TheLaughingCow]

Kayman, I'm forced to agree with Aames on this one.
Please stop trolling Highlander and Aames. It's rude. Even your name is a troll name ('kay, man).
Just...stop.

[Kayman]

Why do you insist on attacking and trolling every post I make? How do your posts go unnoticed by Winston when I get my posts deleted when I am offering sound, educated advice? I feel this is a very valid topic and one that is of great interest to me. I'm looking for any way possible to maintain my hair and if this helps me in my quest to do so, I would like to hear some educated opinions regarding it.

Lighten up. If your posts are being deleted by mods and mine aren't then that should tell you something.