Anecdotal claims to have had success from use of LaserComb is no problem at all. If it worked for you, then great. Tell people.
But to claim there is scientific evidence of its positive performance is strictly false if you have read the journal articles carefully. If you persist on claiming there is scientific evidence of efficacy, then yes, there is a problem. Hairmax got FDA clearance for safety of the device, NOT efficacy. The data clearly do not support efficacy.
Anecdotal claims to have had success from use of LaserComb is no problem at all. If it worked for you, then great. Tell people.
But to claim there is scientific evidence of its positive performance is strictly false if you have read the journal articles carefully. If you persist on claiming there is scientific evidence of efficacy, then yes, there is a problem. Hairmax got FDA clearance for safety of the device, NOT efficacy. The data clearly do not support efficacy.
This is the only answer that should ever be given when someone inquires about hairloss combs.
Anecdotal claims to have had success from use of LaserComb is no problem at all. If it worked for you, then great. Tell people.
But to claim there is scientific evidence of its positive performance is strictly false if you have read the journal articles carefully. If you persist on claiming there is scientific evidence of efficacy, then yes, there is a problem. Hairmax got FDA clearance for safety of the device, NOT efficacy. The data clearly do not support efficacy.
Anecdotal claims to have had success from use of LaserComb is no problem at all. If it worked for you, then great. Tell people.
But to claim there is scientific evidence of its positive performance is strictly false if you have read the journal articles carefully. If you persist on claiming there is scientific evidence of efficacy, then yes, there is a problem. Hairmax got FDA clearance for safety of the device, NOT efficacy. The data clearly do not support efficacy.
So if they claim that a laser comb does work and is backed up by scientific journals, I should see that as a red flag?
Its odd that some people use lasers to remove hair and others use them to promote hair... but apparently the hair growth ones use a different "laser wavelength"; one that supposedly promotes rather than kills the hair folicle.
Not really. There are different kinds of laser being used for different purposes ranging from making accurate cuts in thick sheets of steel to helping wounds heal.
Not really. There are different kinds of laser being used for different purposes ranging from making accurate cuts in thick sheets of steel to helping wounds heal.
Maybe the laser creates Vitamin D just like Sun Light, and it is well known that Vitamin D is good for hair. That maybe the reason why some people claim LaserComb to be useful.
So if they claim that a laser comb does work and is backed up by scientific journals, I should see that as a red flag?
If there is bona fide scientific evidence with proper controls published in a peer-reviewed journal then no red flag. Use it. Hairmax Lasercomb has thus far not met with these requirements.
Comment