GCs recipient area-closer look

[didi]

534321

You are back, we missed you, I thought you got banned...you got 9 lives 5432123

actually I needed your objective unbiased opinion about GCs recipient area, 1.35 hairs/graft according to my calculation, maybe you could double check that before GC supplies better quality pic?

Do you think we need that 50 graft test or test is absolutely unnecessary since its crystal clear to everybody that HST works as claimed?

[534623]

Do you think we need that 50 graft test or test is absolutely unnecessary since its crystal clear to everybody that HST works as claimed?

hmmrm, I would (unbiased) say, if someone doesn't trust these claims - don't buy it.

[didi]

hmmrm, I would (unbiased) say, if someone doesn't trust these claims - don't buy it.

IM

Thats fine if someone doesnt beleive in procedure then they shouldnt go for it BUT

Wouldnt you want to see the test which will prove or disprove HST beyond reasonable doubt?

You seem to be content with proofs we had so far but you know that looking at donor area isnt enough to be sure if it works as advertised.
It would be benefitial for prospective patients to know for sure what they are getting, not just having blind faith

As you can see GCs growth in recipient is way bellow claimed 2.0-2.5 g/cm2, and if you look at his latest pic(back of his head) you will see plenty of doubles, no shortage of them, in fact most of them are doubles, no reason why mid scalp area can not be covered with multiple grafts, his donor can definately take it..and Spencer said something along thse lines:


"...And a lot of the guys, including the celebrities that he is doing surgery on, when you see them in real world situations, when they are not, you know, prepared to be on camera, uhhh, their hairlines look OK, but, you know, very thin for someone who went through a procedure. Usually when a 2000 graft procedure from a traditional strip or a good FUE surgeon, you are gonna see a more substantial result. At least from what I’ve seen..."