GCs donor pic 24 days after 3000 grafts-donor density

[534623]

As stated before, BTT intends to fully comply with Dr. Gho's request to discourage and moderate inappropriate, inaccurate, disparaging, intentionally argumentative and defamatory commentary related to discussions, concerning HST, his colleagues, and/or other available hair restoration techniques (FUE/FUT) in relation to HST or Dr. Coen Gho himself.

Also, in direct response to Dr. Gho's request, all baseless and false accusations or disruptive posts on both HST related threads and non Gho/HST threads will no longer be hosted on baldtruthtalk.com

Is it still allowed to mention "Dr. Coen Gho"?
I mean, the name itself IS already an argument in the hair restoration field.

By the way "hair restoration" per se - would you consider someone as "colleague" who creates new problems to solve another problem? Can the latter also considered as "intentionally argumentative" or rather as fact?
And who is the judge in the whole line of arguments? Arguments, you know, it's something a discussion is based on.

Ahh, I can see - Winston doesn't have a real argument - he has a delete button!