I think the Team Tokyo story is the ideal BASIS for further discussions concerning "why do you need to clone hairs" rather than "curing" still existing zombies with different topical or injectable snake oil methods.
So let's start from scratch:
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal...comms1784.html
So what the Tokyo guys did, were 2 different studies and different methods:
1) hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of mouse hair stem cells in mouse skin;
2) hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of
human HF stem cells in mouse skin;
Both worked basically - BUT what exactly has been the difference (and there has been a BIG difference) concerning the method they used when they tried to regenerate HUMAN hair follicles in the mouse skin?
If you find the correct answer(s) in the posted paper and if you post the correct answer in this thread - you can win a cookie!
Bookmarks