Hair Cloning/Multiplication

[534623]

I'm curious Iron_Man...what is the answer to that?

Hi Desmond - you shouldn't ask; my answer is unimportant. That's the reason why I say another guy (with no life) should answer it.

But, seriously ...
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal...comms1784.html

...is this (for the smart guys with a life) RUSSIAN or what??
I mean, English is not even my first language, but I can understand ever shit in this paper - and pretty fast.

[Thinning87]

Hi Desmond - you shouldn't ask; my answer is unimportant. That's the reason why I say another guy (with no life) should answer it.

But, seriously ...
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal...comms1784.html

...is this (for the smart guys with a life) RUSSIAN or what??

I think your life is what is unimportant...

[534623]

I think your life is what is unimportant...

...and I think that is something you can't - I mean, thinking.

[Thinning87]

I think the Team Tokyo story is the ideal BASIS for further discussions concerning "why do you need to clone hairs" rather than "curing" still existing zombies with different topical or injectable snake oil methods.

So let's start from scratch:

http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal...comms1784.html

So what the Tokyo guys did, were 2 different studies and different methods:

1) hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of mouse hair stem cells in mouse skin;

2) hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of human HF stem cells in mouse skin;

Both worked basically - BUT what exactly has been the difference (and there has been a BIG difference) concerning the method they used when they tried to regenerate HUMAN hair follicles in the mouse skin?

If you find the correct answer(s) in the posted paper and if you post the correct answer in this thread - you can win a cookie!

No one gives a shit about your little games. If you got something to say, then just say it. And get a life.