Lets face it, in order for HST to get more popular technique in hair restoration industry it needs big improvements or else it will just remain in shaddow of FUE/FUT till REAL Hair Multiplication
arrives, which is could be in the next 5 or 10 yrs,but it will happen.
In its current shape and form there is no way it will become mainstream, it simply isnt on par with fue/fut some key areas.
The biggest issue with current HST is not high cost of procedures but its TIME needed to achieve desired goal9especially High NWs
With normal HT all you need is 2-3 visits which can be done over a period of 1-2 yrs,and you will be done whereas with HST it will take you very long time to achieve the same,
4-7 years to get high NWs completed with small procedures that are currently on offer.
That is a BIG diffeence and Im not surprised HST never thretened traditional transplants.
Its time for Dr Gho to start working on some improvements that HST badlly needs,
either
a) sessions needs to increase OR
b) time between each session needs to decrease
I think option b is more realistic then option a.
We know that HASCI only harvest about 10% of available donor per pass and we know
regeneration occurs withing first 4 weeks.
is it really necessary to wait 9 months or a year between procedures?
What are the chances that Gho will harvest the same follicle twice? About 10%, its very low
Gho can offer second procedure after say 3-4-5 months and TRY to avoid follicles which were extracted in previous procedure OR even if he performs blind harvest again ther is only a low chance of
10% that he will extract the same follicle again.(benefit outweigh the risks)
OR Hasci can do the following
1st procedure hasci extracts 1500 1s only,
2nd procedure, 4-5 months later, hasci extracts ONLY 2s
3rd procedure 4-5 mothhs later ,hasci goes for 3s only...
and is goes through cycles till the final result is achieved
Any suggestions?
arrives, which is could be in the next 5 or 10 yrs,but it will happen.
In its current shape and form there is no way it will become mainstream, it simply isnt on par with fue/fut some key areas.
The biggest issue with current HST is not high cost of procedures but its TIME needed to achieve desired goal9especially High NWs
With normal HT all you need is 2-3 visits which can be done over a period of 1-2 yrs,and you will be done whereas with HST it will take you very long time to achieve the same,
4-7 years to get high NWs completed with small procedures that are currently on offer.
That is a BIG diffeence and Im not surprised HST never thretened traditional transplants.
Its time for Dr Gho to start working on some improvements that HST badlly needs,
either
a) sessions needs to increase OR
b) time between each session needs to decrease
I think option b is more realistic then option a.
We know that HASCI only harvest about 10% of available donor per pass and we know
regeneration occurs withing first 4 weeks.
is it really necessary to wait 9 months or a year between procedures?
What are the chances that Gho will harvest the same follicle twice? About 10%, its very low
Gho can offer second procedure after say 3-4-5 months and TRY to avoid follicles which were extracted in previous procedure OR even if he performs blind harvest again ther is only a low chance of
10% that he will extract the same follicle again.(benefit outweigh the risks)
OR Hasci can do the following
1st procedure hasci extracts 1500 1s only,
2nd procedure, 4-5 months later, hasci extracts ONLY 2s
3rd procedure 4-5 mothhs later ,hasci goes for 3s only...
and is goes through cycles till the final result is achieved
Any suggestions?
Comment