-
Results from 2nd Procedure
Code:
# Regenerated?
1 Yes
2 Yes
3 No
4 No
5 Yes
6 Yes
7 Yes
8 Yes
9 Yes
10 Yes
11 Yes
12 Yes
13 Yes
14 Yes
15 No
16 Yes
17 Yes
18 Yes
19 Yes
20 No
21 Yes
22 No
23 Yes
24 Yes
25 Yes
26 Yes
27 Yes
28 No
29 No
30 Yes
31 Yes
32 Yes
33 Yes
34 Yes
35 No
36 Yes
37 Yes
38 Yes
39 No
40 Yes
41 No
42 Yes
43 No
44 Yes
45 Yes
46 Yes
47 No
48 Yes
49 Yes
50 Yes
51 Yes
52 Yes
53 No
54 Yes
55 Yes
56 No
57 No
58 Yes
59 Yes
60 Yes
61 No
62 Yes
63 Yes
64 Yes
65 Yes
66 Yes
67 Yes
68 Yes
69 No?
70 Yes
71 No
72 Yes
73 Yes
74 Yes
75 Yes
76 Yes
77 No
78 Yes
79 Yes
80 Yes
81 Yes
82 Yes
83 Yes
84 Yes
85 Yes
86 Yes
87 Yes
88 No
89 Yes
90 Yes
91 Yes
92 Yes
93 Yes
94 No
95 Yes
96 Yes
97 Yes
98 Yes
99
100 Yes
101 Yes
102 Yes
103 Yes
104 Yes
105 Yes
106 Yes
107 Yes
108 Yes
109 Yes
I think I didn't label point #99 in the second procedure
-
Results from 3rd Procedure
Code:
# Regen? Quality Times Extracted
1 Yes Same
2 Yes Same
3 Yes Less hairs Multiple
4 No - Multiple
5 Yes Same
6 Yes Less hairs Multiple
7 Yes Same Multiple
8 No -
9 Yes Less hairs Multiple
10 Yes Less hairs Multiple
11 Yes Less hairs?
12 No - Multiple
13 No -
14 Yes Less hairs
15 Yes Same
16 Yes Less hairs, thinner
17 No -
18 Yes Less hairs Multiple
19 Yes Same
20 Yes Less hairs, thinner
21 Yes Same
22 Yes Thinner
23 Yes Less hairs, thinner
24 Yes Same
25 Yes Thinner
26 Yes Thinner
27 Yes Same
28 Yes Same
29 Yes Same
30 Yes Same
31 No -
32 No -
33 Yes Same
34 Yes Same
35 Yes Thinner
36 Yes Same
37 Yes Same
38 Yes Thinner
39 No -
40 Yes Less hairs
41 Yes Less hairs
42 Yes Same
43 Yes Same
44 Yes Same
45 Yes Same
46 Yes Same
47 Yes Thinner
48 Yes Same
49 Yes Same
50 Yes Same
51 Yes Same
52 Yes Same
53 Yes? Twisted
54 Yes Less hairs, thinner
55 Yes Less hairs, thinner
56 No - Multiple
57 Yes Less hairs, thinner Multiple
58 Yes Less hairs
59 Yes Less hairs
60 Yes Same
61 Yes Same Multiple
62 No -
63 Yes Same
64 Yes Less hairs
65 Yes Less hairs, thinner
66 Yes Same
67 No -
68 Yes Same
69 Yes Same
70 No - Multiple
71 Yes Same
72 Yes Less hairs, thinner? Multiple
73 Yes Same
74 Yes Same
75 No -
76 Yes Thinner
77 Yes Same Multiple
78 Yes Less hairs, thinner
79 Yes Less hairs
80 Yes Same
81 Yes Thinner
82 No -
83 Yes Same
84 Yes Thinner
85 Yes Less hairs Multiple
86 Yes Same
87 No -
88 Yes Less hairs
89 Yes Same
90 Yes Same Multiple
91 Yes Same
92 No - Multiple
93 Yes Same
94 No -
95 No -
96 Yes Same
97 No - Multiple
98 Yes Same Multiple
99 Yes Same
100 Yes Same
101 Yes Same
102 Yes Thinner
103 Yes Same
104 Yes Thinner
105 Yes Same
106 Yes Same
107 Yes Same
108 Yes Same
109 Yes Less hairs
110 Yes Same
111 Yes Less hairs? Multiple
112 No -
113 Yes Same
114 No -
115 Yes Same
116 Yes Less hairs?
117 Yes Twisted
118 No -
119 No -
120 Yes Less hairs?
121 Yes Less hairs
122 No -
123 Yes Same
124 Yes Same Multiple
125 Yes Same?
126 Yes Thinner
127 Yes Same
-
These are seriously impressive stats JJ, time to put your feet up now.
Now we have all these thinner hairs numbered I will take a photo again in say 3 months or so on and it might be the case that they grow thicker again.
I know that sounds like positive spin, but either way, I'm extremely happy with 80% regeneration, I don't think anybody could be unhappy with stats like this.
-
Really great work JJ!! Tanks!
It would be interesting to do a similar study of the reception area to see how many hairs that survive. This probably should be done after 12 months
-
Originally Posted by gc83uk
These are seriously impressive stats JJ, time to put your feet up now.
Now we have all these thinner hairs numbered I will take a photo again in say 3 months or so on and it might be the case that they grow thicker again.
I know that sounds like positive spin, but either way, I'm extremely happy with 80% regeneration, I don't think anybody could be unhappy with stats like this.
Hi GC
Well done on your success.
Can I just ask, do you plan to keep your hair shaved or will you be able to grow it out? I have been a bit of a sceptic of Gho in the past, but would he be a good option for a receder, in your opinion? My hairline is receding but the hair on my crown has always remained pretty strong, so I'm wondering if he is a good option for hairline restoration
I am curious about the hair length as I never wear a buzz cut...it doesn't suit me.
Thanks mate
-
Originally Posted by garethbale
Hi GC
Well done on your success.
Can I just ask, do you plan to keep your hair shaved or will you be able to grow it out? I have been a bit of a sceptic of Gho in the past, but would he be a good option for a receder, in your opinion? My hairline is receding but the hair on my crown has always remained pretty strong, so I'm wondering if he is a good option for hairline restoration
I am curious about the hair length as I never wear a buzz cut...it doesn't suit me.
Thanks mate
Cheers mate, I take it your a Spurs fan with a name like that, I'm a gooner so as long as we knick 4th place in the run in, I'll be happy with that!
But Bale is something else, think you'll struggle to keep hold of him tbh...
Yea going to keep my hair shaved to a zero for the next 3 or so months, then as the new hair grows out, I'll grow it to a number 1. After my next procedure later this year I may grow it out again to a more normal length, time will tell, but I don't see why there would be a problem, just having the option is nice enough!
Yes I think he is a good option for hair line work. He can get you a density of around 50 grafts per cm2, I'm aware other clinics can go higher than that, but a scarless procedure with regrowth in your donor is priceless IMO.
-
Originally Posted by Ted
It would be interesting to do a similar study of the reception area to see how many hairs that survive. This probably should be done after 12 months
For that, hairy man gc is an excellent candidate on one hand, a rather bad candidate on the other hand…
gc – the excellent candidate
He is an excellent candidate concerning former being SLICK BALD on top. That means, it’s, in fact, easy to count and to analyze every implanted HST graft, because there were not any pre-existing hairs – not even any tiny vellus hairs!
So everything what you can see and WILL see in future - and there is simply no room for trickery or BS whatever, are all 100% hairs of implanted HST grafts (more accurate implanted follicular stem cells) from gc’s donor area.
gc – the bad candidate
gc is NOT a normal AGA patient. According to his reports, he suddenly lost ALL hairs on top of his head when he was 8 years old or so. That means, the skin itself on top of his head didn’t contain any follicles/hairs (not even vellus hairs!) since around 22 years. It is well-known, that skin in general, which doesn’t contain follicles/hairs since a very long time, is not really the ideal environment for successful hair transplants – especially when there is SCARRING alopecia involved.
The latter is THE reason (besides gc’s former 2 small test procedures) , why they –in gc’s case- always used the stick & place method for implantation of the grafts. So in gc’s case, it’s rather like transplanting of grafts into strip scars (at least similar), and transplanting into scars, has always been a tricky thing concerning the success rate – aka “take rate”. So that’s the reason why he also is a rather “bad candidate” for recipient area studies. But so far, as mentioned, his 2 small test procedures were so far very convincing and promising.
-
-
Originally Posted by Vox
Well, I am the perfect candidate for a radically different and original case study with Gho's method: NW6, probably 7, typical AGA case ...
Nope. Unfortunately, you’re not. I think Dr. Gho has such candidates anyhow “in the work”, but for most of such candidates –even with HST- the biggest problem is still TIME & MONEY.
If I would be a NW 6 or even a NW 7 candidate, I think I would rather try a scarless removal of all transplanted hairs (small HT’s in the 90s) and to fix up my strip scars. Then I would shave down everything and move on, because not everybody is willing to have lots of procedures over too many years and to spend simply TOO MUCH for hair transplants. $20,000 perhaps, maybe even $30,000 to $40,000 for a “full” head of hair again. But many guys, even if money is not the issue at all – they simply do not want to spend this money for hair transplants. BUT …
If there would be something what could give realistically even a NW 6 or 7 candidate within 2-3 years or so at least a BIG PART of his hair back, and without a big loss of hair in the donor area or whatever, I think in this case, such guys would rather try it and would see more sense to spend money for hair transplants …
I think you would be rather a candidate for HST 3.0 …
http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=155
Anyway, as JJ suggests,
we should rather stay on topic – namely JJ’s excellent donor regeneration analysis. On the other hand, is there really much to add?
gc83uk, JJJJrS and I have already clear visible demonstrated what’s possible and what’s not with Dr. Gho’s (2.0) technique. But, sure, there will always be idiots who have useless shit to add …
-
Originally Posted by gc83uk
Cheers mate, I take it your a Spurs fan with a name like that, I'm a gooner so as long as we knick 4th place in the run in, I'll be happy with that!
But Bale is something else, think you'll struggle to keep hold of him tbh...
Yea going to keep my hair shaved to a zero for the next 3 or so months, then as the new hair grows out, I'll grow it to a number 1. After my next procedure later this year I may grow it out again to a more normal length, time will tell, but I don't see why there would be a problem, just having the option is nice enough!
Yes I think he is a good option for hair line work. He can get you a density of around 50 grafts per cm2, I'm aware other clinics can go higher than that, but a scarless procedure with regrowth in your donor is priceless IMO.
Yes mate, I am a Spurs fan, for my sins! Things are going well at the moment but I always fear our end of season collapse. Bale is quality though but might be difficult to hang on to him, even if we do get top 4.
I like Gho's clean work, donor looks pristine and the lack of detection of surgery is a plus. Also, I wouldn't want work colleagues knowing if I had a HT and Gho's healing time seems the quickest.
My only concern is the thickness of the result, I have fairly thick hair and would hope that any work done on the hairline would be thick as well. His lack of published before and after pics and price are a concern though, so I will probably just make enquiries at this stage.
Thanks!
Similar Threads
-
By Kiwi in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 8
Last Post: 01-14-2013, 02:40 PM
-
By tdo in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 4
Last Post: 12-19-2012, 09:10 AM
-
By alanrudy in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 2
Last Post: 08-03-2012, 11:24 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 14
Last Post: 03-19-2011, 05:53 AM
-
By CIT in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 0
Last Post: 09-17-2009, 02:05 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks