-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
Why would anybody spend their savings on 1200 grafts only to have to come back three or four times and spend it all over again.
I want to see analysis on this site by real scientists. Not biased, bitter and grumpy NW7s like ironman (542315 blah).
Save your money folks. Gho is just a type of FUE. Wait for Histogen - you'll wish you had the Gho money when they launch!
Because some people don't need 10,000 grafts and would prefer to have their appearance look solid RIGHT NOW rather than wait 2+ years.
-
I am not the one claiming Gho's procedure works. You are. Prove it.
-
Originally Posted by maxhair
I am not the one claiming Gho's procedure works. You are. Prove it.
I'm not the one claiming it doesn't work. You are. Prove it!
-
Originally Posted by 534623
I'm not the one claiming it doesn't work. You are. Prove it!
This is actually a valid point. Its kind of like atheism vs. any religion. We all know which one has facts to back it up and which one doesnt.... just like the naysayers against Gho not having much of an argument proving it doesnt work.
-
I'll check back in 90 days for any hard evidence.
Goodbye!
-
Originally Posted by maxhair
I'll check back in 90 days for any hard evidence.
And I will do the same.
If I don’t see any hard evidence of disproof of Dr. Gho's claims, it’s completely the same like the hair transplant industry reports worldwide:
“Dr. Gho’s HST works great and as claimed!”
This is no joke! It’s completely the same.
Anyway, I have just made a red cross in my calendar and labelled it with “The day the HT industry admits and announces worldwide that Dr. Gho’s HST works great and as claimed!”
See you! … in 90 days.
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
This is actually a valid point. Its kind of like atheism vs. any religion. We all know which one has facts to back it up and which one doesnt.... just like the naysayers against Gho not having much of an argument proving it doesnt work.
I don't think all the skepticism about Dr. Gho comes from people who want to "prove that it doesn't work". Some of us feel it might be legit but just aren't fully sure yet. Given the amount of snake oil and bullshit in the hair loss industry I think it's wise to be skeptical and extra careful about new products and procedures until they become widely adopted and endorsed by the hair loss community.
-
Originally Posted by 534623
Okay, now I've simplified the game somewhat (just in case maxhair and the HT industry has already headaches lol) so that it is easier for you to knock-out Dr. Gho...
I simply did the following:
I marked just 1 single extractions site in all photos und labelled this extraction site with #12. Number 12 is easy to find above gc’s birthmark, and you can see EVERYTHING and every detail in all photos when you CLICK INTO THE PHOTOS TO ENLARGE THEM…
BEFORE extractions (12 hours BEFORE gc’s 3rd treatment)
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/...before-HST.jpg
2 days after extractions
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/...days-after.jpg
8 days after extractions
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/...days-after.jpg
Here is the whole and well-documented HISTORY of extraction site #12 at a glance – THE voodoo-photo:
Different photo-angles or different light conditions of such photos, are completely irrelevant for making a detailed analysis…
As you can see, sometimes I had to turn some photos somewhat, just so that VIEWERS are more easily able to compare the marked and analyzed observation areas (blue squares in the photos).
So feel free to encircle and to label all the other extractions sites of your choice around (in a star-like pattern) or below or above or on the left side or on the right side of extraction site number 12 – which now serves as a MARKER for you, so to speak. Oh, and don’t forget to report the percentage (%) of regrowth sites - or NO REGROWTH sites ...
I mean, everybody out there, who is able to find his ass with both hands, is able to knock out Dr. Gho with these photos. Anyway ... in 90 days ...the countdown is running ...
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
This is actually a valid point. Its kind of like atheism vs. any religion. We all know which one has facts to back it up and which one doesnt.... just like the naysayers against Gho not having much of an argument proving it doesnt work.
Surely the burden of proof is on Gho to prove his claims. In the religion example you mention is would be the same...religion would need facts to back up its claims, atheists see no facts and hence they do not believe in the notion of there being a God.
Re Gho, his results look very clean but I am yet to be convinced that he can achieve any better coverage than a traditional HT surgeon. He is also ridiculously expensive as well.
-
Senior Member
I wasn't aware of any guys who'd choose HST over traditional transplants for getting better coverage.... hmmm
Similar Threads
-
By stormlaw in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 16
Last Post: 05-18-2011, 09:42 PM
-
By Spex in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 3
Last Post: 03-02-2011, 07:45 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 25
Last Post: 07-24-2010, 12:01 PM
-
By CuriousGuy in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 4
Last Post: 05-26-2010, 09:27 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks