Histogen – TrichoScan analysis vs. side-by-side comparison

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1865

    #61
    Originally posted by SoClose

    ... could it not be argued that what is deemed to be FUs in the "wrong position" is actually just growth of new hair?
    No - no way!
    Compare the pics of both trail subjects (S2018 vs S1016) again:



    Subject 2018 IS definitely the same area, same trail subject. It’s simply obvious – actually at a glance. This is clearly not so with trail subject 1016, because WHERE are the existing terminal hairs/FU’s from the baseline pic in the 3 month pic?

    Furthermore, a specific pattern/positioning of follicular units (FU’s) DOESN’T dramatically change not even after decades (like your nose - your nose will always be in the middle of your face!) – especially not that extreme just within 3 month (!!) as shown in the after pic of S1016. So again, where is the existing pattern/positioning of all EXISTING thick terminal hairs of the baseline pic in the 3 month pic? As you can SEE yourself, this is –of course- not so with trail subject S2018. S2018 neither changed its FU-pattern in general, nor a change of the positions of the existing terminal hairs/follicular units - what finally made a side-by-side comparision possible and pretty easy.

    A certain pattern of follicular units is like a FINGERPRINT!
    S1016 = NO MATCH!

    Comment

    • 2020
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 1527

      #62
      ^ all of those problems could have been solved if Histogen just gave us a simple table instead of 8 pages of vague graphs:

      Code:
                       3 months            6 months
      Subject 1:         25%                  40%
      Subject 2:         42%                  58%
      Subject 3:         33%                  64%
      ...
      now all we got is two data points from best possible results which have been exaggerated to the max...

      Comment

      • lurker77
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2012
        • 11

        #63
        Originally posted by 534623
        No - no way!
        Compare the pics of both trail subjects (S2018 vs S1016) again:



        Subject 2018 IS definitely the same area, same trail subject. It’s simply obvious – actually at a glance. This is clearly not so with trail subject 1016, because WHERE are the existing terminal hairs/FU’s from the baseline pic in the 3 month pic?

        Furthermore, a specific pattern/positioning of follicular units (FU’s) DOESN’T dramatically change not even after decades (like your nose - your nose will always be in the middle of your face!) – especially not that extreme just within 3 month (!!) as shown in the after pic of S1016. So again, where is the existing pattern/positioning of all EXISTING thick terminal hairs of the baseline pic in the 3 month pic? As you can SEE yourself, this is –of course- not so with trail subject S2018. S2018 neither changed its FU-pattern in general, nor a change of the positions of the existing terminal hairs/follicular units - what finally made a side-by-side comparision possible and pretty easy.

        A certain pattern of follicular units is like a FINGERPRINT!
        S1016 = NO MATCH!

        Oh, Ironman.

        Comment

        Working...