-
Hair Science Academy – HST training for doctors from all over the world!
Just found the following NEWS on http://www.hasci.com/homepage.aspx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
European Patent for Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®!
As of August 8th 2012 Hair Stem Cell Transplantation® is not only patented in The Netherlands but in the whole of Europe. The patent with the number 1957092 is titled ‘Method for in vivo multiplication of hair’.
paper 1
http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloa...7Patent_1b.pdf
paper 2
http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloa...3Patent_2a.pdf
Based on this European patent Hair Science Institute (HSI) assumes that finally clarity has arisen when it comes to the rights, claims, and implementation concerning Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®. In the (recent) past these were doubted more than once in the courtroom by other hair transplantation clinics. Each time however with for HSCI very favourable rulings.
In the meanwhile HSCI has started with the building of a Hair Science Academy. Located at Medical Centre ‘De Wittevrouwenhof’ in Maastricht (Netherlands) it will receive doctors and technicians from all over the world. Here they will be trained in executing Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®. After certification they will be entitled to apply the patented technique on their own clients and patients.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-
Senior Member
-
Maybe the patent had something to do with Spencer's delayed interview?
-
whoa, that's big news.
update: Hairs coming in surprisingly well at the 1.5 month mark. Excited to see how things look at the 12 month mark. Will maybe post my pictures in the coming weeks.
-
Just because something is patented, does not mean it works.
It just means that it is novel.
When Gho turns a Norwood 6 or 7 with low/average donor density into a Norwood 2, then believe him.
You can't polish a turd, but you probably can patent it as a safe hair loss cure.
-
Originally Posted by maxhair
Just because something is patented, does not mean it works.
It just means that it is novel.
When Gho turns a Norwood 6 or 7 with low/average donor density into a Norwood 2, then believe him.
You can't polish a turd, but you probably can patent it as a safe hair loss cure.
You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.
Thats bullshit. If Gho really wanted to promote himself as a solution for NW6 or NW7 he'd have done this and have photographic evidence.
What really sux about Gho's solution is that if the techniques he learnt were "patented" in the first place he wouldnt be where he is now.
Yay! Now we're more behind and less likely to get the results from this procedure because he's a douche bag.
-
Originally Posted by hellouser
You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.
If you can turn a N6 or 7 to a N1 or 2, then you find someone who doesn't mind sharing, and you publicize his transformation.
"Er... yeah... he probably can't find a willing volunteer who is bald to undergo a transformation so drastic everyone will know he's had work anyway, because er... he wouldn't want anyone to know... er..."
Get a grip man.
If a surgeon has a cure for baldness, then finding a patient to demonstrate it on will not be a problem you cretin.
-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
Thats bullshit. If Gho really wanted to promote himself as a solution for NW6 or NW7 he'd have done this and have photographic evidence.
What really sux about Gho's solution is that if the techniques he learnt were "patented" in the first place he wouldnt be where he is now.
Yay! Now we're more behind and less likely to get the results from this procedure because he's a douche bag.
You completely ignored the variables I stated and it isn't him alone thats responsible for turning someone from NW6/7 to NW1, he's only HALF the party responsible.
If youre a NW7, why dont YOU sign up for it? That said I'll repeat myself: got the cash? Got the X number of years before you return to NW1? Are you willing to make yourself and your story public?
-
I think the big news is the academy, not the patent
the patent doesn't prove a process works. it just means nobody can use the process.
again though, I am happy with my result thus far-- 1.5 - 1.75 months in
Similar Threads
-
By sanook in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 100
Last Post: 11-05-2012, 02:32 PM
-
By Dutch_Dude in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 49
Last Post: 06-24-2012, 09:02 PM
-
By stillinHS1994 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 6
Last Post: 07-22-2011, 05:02 PM
-
By DepressedByHairLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 13
Last Post: 03-01-2011, 08:24 PM
-
By zxc in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 11-07-2010, 06:14 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks