-
Originally Posted by StressedToTheBald
There are other ingredients, natural ones, also backed by real studies but sadly less popular...
They are unpopular because they do not work. Is is that simple. There is nothing more to it than that. There is no conspiracy. They simply do not work. Those "studies" you keep throwing around do not hold up to legitimate medical scrutiny. If you persist on this foolish course, you will eventually find that out for yourself.
-
There are plenty natural DHT inhibitors you should give a go if you're not willing to experiment with a drug that ruins other parts of people's lives.
-
Originally Posted by rupe
There are plenty natural DHT inhibitors you should give a go if you're not willing to experiment with a drug that ruins other parts of people's lives.
Exactly. And don't let anyone tell You that are no studies about natural DHT inhibitors. There are plenty of studies - it just the propecia promoters dislike even the very thought of natural competition. I myself am using a number of the ingredients from the studies listed below and fingers crossed in the months to follow I'd very much like to be the proof that that there is a safe, side effects free alternative...
^ Prager N, Bickett K, French N,Marcovici G (2002). "A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of botanically derived inhibitors of 5-a-reductase in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia". J Altern Complement Ther 8: 148-52. PMID 12006122.
^ Raynaud, JP; Cousse, H; Martin, PM (2002). "Inhibition of type 1 and type 2 5alpha-reductase activity by free fatty acids, active ingredients of Permixon.". The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 82 (2-3): 233–9. doi:10.1016/S0960-0760(02)00187-5. PMID 12477490.
^ Pais, P (2010). "Potency of a novel saw palmetto ethanol extract, SPET-085, for inhibition of 5alpha-reductase II.". Advances in therapy 27 (8): 555–63. doi:10.1007/s12325-010-0041-6. PMID 20623347.
^ Abe, M; Ito, Y; Oyunzul, L; Oki-Fujino, T; Yamada, S (2009). "Pharmacologically relevant receptor binding characteristics and 5alpha-reductase inhibitory activity of free Fatty acids contained in saw palmetto extract.". Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin 32 (4): 646–50. doi:10.1248/bpb.32.646. PMID 19336899.
^ Edgar AD. Levin R. Constantinou CE. Denis L. "A critical review of the pharmacology of the plant extract of Pygeum africanum in the treatment of LUTS.Neurourology & Urodynamics. 26(4):458-63; discussion 464, 2007" [Review]
^ Fujita R. Liu J. Shimizu K. Konishi F. Noda K. Kumamoto S. Ueda C. Tajiri H. Kaneko S. Suimi Y. Kondo R."Anti-androgenic activities of Ganoderma lucidum.", Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 102(1):107-12, 2005 Oct 31.
-
Originally Posted by rupe
There are plenty natural DHT inhibitors you should give a go if you're not willing to experiment with a drug that ruins other parts of people's lives.
The problem is none of those "natural" DHT inhibitors do anything meaningful in any way to slow down, stop or reverse hereditary hair loss. None of them. Not a single one. If they actually did, they would likely have the same side effect profile as Finasteride.
Originally Posted by StressedToTheBald
And don't let anyone tell You that are no studies about natural DHT inhibitors. There are plenty of studies - it just the propecia promoters dislike even the very thought of natural competition.
This very thick line of BS you keep dishing out is getting really old. You are in the wrong forum. This forum is called "The Bald Truth". The truth is these "natural" remedies do not work. They never have worked and they likely never will work. Not a single one of those studies you keep peddling can stand up to legitimate scrutiny. You will never find legitimate evidence of anyone who has ever been able to slow down, stop or reverse hereditary hair loss with those so called "natural" remedies. You need to find another forum to peddle the BS you want to keep peddling. This is not the place for it. This forum is to help people find solutions that are proven to work.
-
Originally Posted by Tracy C
They are unpopular because they do not work. Is is that simple. There is nothing more to it than that. There is no conspiracy. They simply do not work. Those "studies" you keep throwing around do not hold up to legitimate medical scrutiny. If you persist on this foolish course, you will eventually find that out for yourself.
This is so true. With hair loss treatments, whether on the early or advanced stages, if it's unpopular...then it is unpopular for a reason.
-
Senior Member
This very thick line of BS you keep dishing out is getting really old. You are in the wrong forum. This forum is called "The Bald Truth". The truth is these "natural" remedies do not work. They never have worked and they likely never will work. Not a single one of those studies you keep peddling can stand up to legitimate scrutiny. You will never find legitimate evidence of anyone who has ever been able to slow down, stop or reverse hereditary hair loss with those so called "natural" remedies. You need to find another forum to peddle the BS you want to keep peddling. This is not the place for it. This forum is to help people find solutions that are proven to work.
Very nicely posted Tracy!
Similar Threads
-
By doke in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 13
Last Post: 06-26-2011, 02:18 PM
-
By HealthNetwork in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 3
Last Post: 05-29-2011, 08:35 AM
-
By Lorne in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 6
Last Post: 10-18-2009, 07:43 PM
-
By joe from staten island in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 1
Last Post: 09-24-2009, 07:20 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks