Spencer Kobren Interviews Replicel's CEO Concerning Latest Clinical Trial Results

[UK_]

This has nothing to do with Replicel, but I would just like you all to know I remember a time when research into repairing nerves to aid prostate cancer victims who had suffered total loss of sensation (ED) was utterly dismal.

Low & behold... technology improves:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...red-limbs.html

My point is that, like all other forms of technology, it will improve, we have come a long way from plugs to 3% hair growth using a patients own cells.

[jman91]

This has nothing to do with Replicel, but I would just like you all to know I remember a time when research into repairing nerves to aid prostate cancer victims who had suffered total loss of sensation (ED) was utterly dismal.

Low & behold... technology improves:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...red-limbs.html

My point is that, like all other forms of technology, it will improve, we have come a long way from plugs to 3% hair growth using a patients own cells.

the daily mail is full of drivel

[gmonasco]

the daily mail is full of drivel

More ignorance. The very same information can be found in plenty of other (more august) outlets than the Daily Mail:

http://www.myscience.me.uk/news/2012...2012-Sheffield

[jman91]

More ignorence, The very same information can be found in plenty of other (more august) outlet's than the Daily Mail:

http://www.myscience.me.uk/news/2012...2012-Sheffield

who would have thought the same story would be out there in the world of recycled internet news! I'm glad these credible scientists were at least responsible enough to repeat words like 'if' 'may' 'could' 'hopes' etc. With 3D organ printing being so relevant hair loss treatments one does wonder why the Daily Mail, being the patron saint of baldness cures would somehow miss an opportunity to spin a science research story into a cure for baldness headline, even they didn't go for it, what is the world coming to!

[gmonasco]

who would have thought the same story would be out there in the world of recycled internet news!

People like you, who clearly can't discern the difference between original reporting and "recycled news."

[BoSox]

Great interview. Although I was depressed after reading through the forums, hearing it directly from David Hall and Spencer calmed me down.

Replicel is moving forward, and that's all that matters.

[jman91]

Great interview. Although I was depressed after reading through the forums, hearing it directly from David Hall and Spencer calmed me down.

Replicel is moving forward, and that's all that matters.

[inappropriate image removed]

[Tracy C]

My point is that, like all other forms of technology, it will improve, we have come a long way from plugs to 3% hair growth using a patients own cells.

It is 12.5% vellus hair plus 3% terminal hair - hair that wasn't there before. That is a significant achievement. Those baby vellus hairs can transform into terminal hair and much of it probably will. The only way an intelligent person can look at this result and see it as a failure is if that person is completely closed minded and wants to see it as a failure. Unfortunately, there are members of this forum who are that closed minded and that negative - and that is a real shame. I could never go though life being that negative and that closed minded.

[sickly_burnt_tree_forest]

I am so glad i listened to that interview, the report sounded worse than the reality of it

[clandestine]

I am so glad i listened to that interview, the report sounded worse than the reality of it

Really? Personally I wasn't terribly impressed by David Hall in this interview.