Dr. Cotsarelis New Discovery that may finally cure Baldness (June 3rd, 2013)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oppenheimer82
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 118

    #16
    Originally posted by TravisB
    Huh, so Follica isn't dead afterall?

    Good.

    But as always, most likely nothing will come from it (at least not in the next 10 years)
    buy fgf9, needles, syringes, alcohol pads and a dermaroller, to create the wounds. no need to wait 10 years, hahahaha.

    Comment

    • rdawg
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 1019

      #17
      Originally posted by oppenheimer82
      buy fgf9, needles, syringes, alcohol pads and a dermaroller, to create the wounds. no need to wait 10 years, hahahaha.
      obviously just talking theory here, wouldn't a dermaroller be good enough? then simply applying the fgf9 stimulating drug on top of the wound?

      this stuff sounds solid in theory, see if it actually works, any volunteers?

      also any chemists, pharmacists, dr's etc. that know the potential danger of injecting this stuff?

      Comment

      • TravisB
        Senior Member
        • May 2012
        • 191

        #18
        Originally posted by rdawg
        obviously just talking theory here, wouldn't a dermaroller be good enough? then simply applying the fgf9 stimulating drug on top of the wound?

        this stuff sounds solid in theory, see if it actually works, any volunteers?
        Lol, that's actually a good idea

        But where the hell can we buy fgf9?

        Comment

        • Thinning87
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 847

          #19
          Originally posted by TravisB
          Huh, so Follica isn't dead afterall?

          Good.

          But as always, most likely nothing will come from it (at least not in the next 10 years)
          right on man very useful input

          Comment

          • JulioGP
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 294

            #20
            The only problem is that everything is tested in rats for some reason never reaches the final stage, humans.

            Anyway, fingers crossed.

            Comment

            • Westonci
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 254

              #21
              Originally posted by JulioGP
              The only problem is that everything is tested in rats for some reason never reaches the final stage, humans.

              Anyway, fingers crossed.
              Its funny you mention that. Cotrsarelis actually wanted to find out why mice would form new hairs after wounding and why humans would not, and thats how he discovered Fgf9.

              According to the article mice naturally have elevated levels of Fgf9 in their skin, which explains why they regenerate new hairs after wounding.

              Humans on the other hand have significantly less Fgf9 in our skin, and explains why we have trouble forming new hairs after wounding.

              So basically we need to externally add Fgf9 during the wounding process to create new hairs.

              Comment

              • Thinning87
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2012
                • 847

                #22
                the article mentions that they have told the author that human trials have already been made....

                Comment

                • TravisB
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2012
                  • 191

                  #23
                  It's another study that was done on MICE

                  there is no evidence that it will even work on humans

                  It's not a big deal to grow hair on mice. It looks like anyone can do it these days because everything you put on mice regrows their hair.

                  It's similar thing as with all this PGD2 crap

                  Comment

                  • KO1
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 805

                    #24
                    Guys, if any of you actually does this, remember to inhibit PGD2 while wounding. Garza's paper last year stated that PGD2 inhibits new follicle formation - this could have hindered Follica.

                    Comment

                    • Thinning87
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 847

                      #25
                      Originally posted by TravisB
                      It's another study that was done on MICE

                      there is no evidence that it will even work on humans

                      It's not a big deal to grow hair on mice. It looks like anyone can do it these days because everything you put on mice regrows their hair.

                      It's similar thing as with all this PGD2 crap
                      Yes genius straighten these idiots from the University of Pennsylvania and UCSF out, they are clearly missing your point.

                      Comment

                      • Westonci
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 254

                        #26
                        Heres the official press Release


                        Comment

                        • Boldy
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2013
                          • 287

                          #27
                          Here is further discussion about it:

                          Comment

                          • Westonci
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 254

                            #28
                            Here's the article in the journal Nature medicine.

                            Comment

                            • Joker
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2012
                              • 123

                              #29
                              No sense in arguing, but TravisB is wrong. Follica stated that this approach has advanced through Phase IIa clinical testing (in humans) and has "consistently created substantial new hair follicle growth in humans."

                              I'm sure the treatment isn't perfect, but the theory itself has been proved in the human model and isn't limited to mice. This fgf finding makes the translation from mice to humans more likely.

                              I would urge people to remain extremely cautious about this, but there's no doubt that it's exciting.

                              Source (provided by Thinning87 on another thread):

                              Creativity can be learned, and everyone can develop good copy. One Led Inc's Lead Copywriter Brianne Dromey showed us a complete framework on how to ace the process and write unique headlines.

                              Comment

                              • The Alchemist
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 265

                                #30
                                Joker is correct, this has been tested in humans. Quote from the Xconomy article:

                                "Follica said in its statement that it has already done preclinical tests that combine devices it has created to disrupt the skin with several unspecified “known and novel drugs.” It also claims to have run “a series” of human clinical trials, including a mid-stage study that has caused new hair follicles to be produced in humans. "

                                Comment

                                Working...