-
Senior Member
Replicel's presentation on The Worl stem Cell 2014
Originally Posted by JDW
Any word on Replicel's presentation at the stem cell summit this week?
Here is the Replicel's presentation on The Worl stem Cell 2014 event :
http://worldstemcellsummit.com/webca...ng-compliance/
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by hellouser
My thoughts on this can be seen in my reply here:
Héhéhé You are Right and this make me laughing too looool
-
Little feedback from Replicel on Twitter:
@CrashOverHead manuf. issues now resolved. Rep and Shiseido moving quickly for P2 trial. Product likely to be available in Japan before EU.
https://twitter.com/RepliCel/status/542822839644983297
-
Sorry if I missed this but are any results actually published of efficiency? And if so what are they?
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Swooping
Sorry if I missed this but are any results actually published of efficiency? And if so what are they?
Hi Swooping
http://www.replicel.com/wp-content/u...iCel-final.pdf
page 4
-
Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.
-
They have "risk factors" in all their MD&A publications for the last several years. I don't know if this is something required by the SEC, but I am not surprised to see it in a stock report. I wouldn't be too discouraged. It is not a statement on whether RCH-01 work but a general CYA statement.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Trouse5858
Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.
It's normal but Replicel's technology works in phase 1, Shiseido is in game too . It's for FDA's rules I presume. Don't forget the recent japan's law about stem cell. Phase 2 would be working like for Histogen. Not reasons to be discourage bro
-
Originally Posted by Trouse5858
Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.
There were people with almost 20% increase in six months though in the pilot study. That's quite a bit better than finasteride and minoxidil. I think if you mixed fin min and rep you would be essentially cured.
-
Originally Posted by brocktherock
There were people with almost 20% increase in six months though in the pilot study. That's quite a bit better than finasteride and minoxidil. I think if you mixed fin min and rep you would be essentially cured.
Histogen after Replicel might work better;
New injected cells plus histogen's growth factors.... that could be real interesting. I wish the two biotechs collaborated and did a single case study.
Similar Threads
-
By Scientalk56 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 17
Last Post: 02-18-2014, 09:02 AM
-
By samdee in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 1
Last Post: 11-15-2013, 04:06 PM
-
By Artista in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 0
Last Post: 02-04-2013, 07:14 AM
-
By ravegrover in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 5
Last Post: 05-01-2012, 09:19 AM
-
By krewel in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 55
Last Post: 11-12-2011, 07:06 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks