-
Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
Thickens existing hair. If there is no follicle present, or if it's so small or vellus, probably won't create cosmetically significant hair.
wait, isn't bima thicken and darken vellus hair and even turn alot of them into terminal hair ?
-
Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
Thickens existing hair. If there is no follicle present, or if it's so small or vellus, probably won't create cosmetically significant hair.
According to Cots follicles don't die but sleeping.
-
Originally Posted by Hairismylife
According to Cots follicles don't die but sleeping.
Yes, but the follicles need to still be producing hair in this case. If they aren't, or if the hairs are so small you can barely see them, it's unlikely that bim will help create cosmetically significant hair.
That's also why he's using a different method to create "follicular neogenesis." It's not as simple as applying a topical compound to your scalp.
-
Originally Posted by RobertSe
wait, isn't bima thicken and darken vellus hair and even turn alot of them into terminal hair ?
Yes, and in the patent for their hair growth solution, the most preferred concentration is 3%, 100X the strength of what is used for eyelashes. Even .03% works somewhat well for hair.
-
Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
That's also why he's using a different method to create "follicular neogenesis." It's not as simple as applying a topical compound to your scalp.
Where can information on follicular neogenesis related to bimataprost be found?
-
Originally Posted by Energizer
Where can information on follicular neogenesis related to bimataprost be found?
Doesn't exist, because that's not what bimatoprost does
-
Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
Doesn't exist, because that's not what bimatoprost does
Ah, so then what is this other method? Or has it not been divulged?
-
Originally Posted by Energizer
Ah, so then what is this other method? Or has it not been divulged?
Research about follica, that's what im talking about when I say "follicular neogenesis"
-
this should at least in theory be much better than Minoxidil.
What I was hoping for in the next few years was essentially an upgrade on our old tools, so say minoxidil gave you 10% growth or thickening, I expect bim to be 2-3X as strong, giving noticable growth, just based on what people got with such a low dose. As well it seems we should be getting an upgrade over fin and dut(finally) soon with all of this PGD2 stuff coming.
I never expected a full-blown cure now, but it seems like we may be getting some bridge products within the next 2-3 years. This is all just speculation btw.
-
Originally Posted by rdawg
this should at least in theory be much better than Minoxidil.
What I was hoping for in the next few years was essentially an upgrade on our old tools, so say minoxidil gave you 10% growth or thickening, I expect bim to be 2-3X as strong, giving noticable growth, just based on what people got with such a low dose. As well it seems we should be getting an upgrade over fin and dut(finally) soon with all of this PGD2 stuff coming.
I never expected a full-blown cure now, but it seems like we may be getting some bridge products within the next 2-3 years. This is all just speculation btw.
Expect bim to be out much sooner than that.
Similar Threads
-
By rdawg in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 309
Last Post: 12-01-2017, 08:02 AM
-
By Tito555 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 7
Last Post: 05-07-2015, 08:58 PM
-
By Desmond84 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 344
Last Post: 02-26-2014, 02:42 AM
-
By matlondon in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 110
Last Post: 10-20-2013, 03:14 PM
-
By Scoots in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 06-20-2012, 06:28 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks