-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Scientalk56
where is that written? :O ?
Just look at the chart under 'temporal recession region' in the PDF Desmond posted. You're talking baout 'terminal density'. It seems to me that this means the terminal hairs just got 25% thicker. Which might give a somewhat noticable effect. But only if you have hair on your temples to begin with, since temple hair count only increased with 2% after 24 months, in that same chart.
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Just look at the chart under 'temporal recession region' in the PDF Desmond posted. You're talking baout 'terminal density'. It seems to me that this means the terminal hairs just got 25% thicker. Which might give a somewhat noticable effect. But only if you have hair on your temples to begin with, since temple hair count only increased with 2% after 24 months, in that same chart.
Can you print screen that please? i can't see it :S
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Scientalk56
Can you print screen that please? i can't see it :S
See the big 'RESULTS' heading in green ? Then look below the picture. You'll see a chart there.
-
lol cant see it, srsly
lol,
i think Freud has to say something about not seeing this...
Is my mind trying so hard to block that, so i wont get traumatized? lol
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Scientalk56
lol,
i think Freud has to say something about not seeing this...
Is my mind trying so hard to block that, so i wont get traumatized? lol
Sorry, I was even pointing you to the wrong chart. It's in the colomn to the right of that colum with the 'results' heading. But you can't miss it
-
ohhh... we're f*c*ed.. :|
i mean if Histogen can't regrow my very big temples, my head will still look funny with new thick hair and no temples... :S
-
Originally Posted by Scientalk56
ohhh... we're f*c*ed.. :|
i mean if Histogen can't regrow my very big temples, my head will still look funny with new thick hair and no temples... :S
Transplant for the temples my friend
-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Just look at the chart under 'temporal recession region' in the PDF Desmond posted. You're talking baout 'terminal density'. It seems to me that this means the terminal hairs just got 25% thicker. Which might give a somewhat noticable effect. But only if you have hair on your temples to begin with, since temple hair count only increased with 2% after 24 months, in that same chart.
In other words.
Histogen was never going to grow hair on slick bald scalp. Hence the 'temple hair increased by 2% after 24 months statement'
It is just a better version if minoxidil.
Most likely we will have to use this in conjunction with having a HT (if you haven't lost your temple hair already)
I suspect HSC is going to be cheap if it requires a yearly booster.
It is also side effect free unlike fin. Like fin it will maintain.
Would you rather be slapping minox on your head, taking fin or just going in yearly for a booster ?
I don't know why you all are moaning. Sure the yearly shots are a pain in the ass. But it's as I've described.
Similar Threads
-
By tbtadmin in forum Histogen's Hair Stimulating Complex (HSC)
Replies: 15
Last Post: 09-04-2018, 10:00 AM
-
By Scoots in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 06-20-2012, 06:28 PM
-
By sebasmarin in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 04-11-2011, 11:19 AM
-
By Dr. Lindsey in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-28-2010, 07:46 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks