-
Originally Posted by gmonasco
But if you look at the figure referenced in that note, it shows photos displaying a hair count going from a baseline of 214.5 hairs to 324.5 hairs after one year, which is only a 51.2% increase.
Why do all your comments seem like you are rooting for this to fail. Which side are you on here?
-
Originally Posted by john2399
Why do all your comments seem like you are rooting for this to fail. Which side are you on here?
He is probably not bald or balding, that's why.
Rather, he gets a kick out of tormenting bald guys.
-
Originally Posted by john2399
Why do all your comments seem like you are rooting for this to fail. Which side are you on here?
I'm on the side of promoting accurate information and realistic expectations. Which side are you on?
-
Originally Posted by gmonasco
I'm on the side of promoting accurate information and realistic expectations. Which side are you on?
Its grown hair though
-
This is incredible and it's just Phase I. I already thought they're good, but not that good..
-
Anyone got any news as to what is being said at this conference thats going on?
-
Originally Posted by jpm
Anyone got any news as to what is being said at this conference thats going on?
10characters
-
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
Its grown hair though
It has, but the important question, as always, is how much of that growth is truly "new" hair (i.e., newly-created follices or revived "dead" follicles) rather than existing hair that has just come out of the telogen (i.e., resting) phase. Histogen's paper references the latter:
"Preclinical studies demonstrated no safety issues and suggested that the induction of anagen in telogen follicles in a murine model of hair growth might be accelerated by injection of HSC."
-
Originally Posted by gmonasco
It has, but the important question, as always, is how much of that growth is truly "new" hair (i.e., newly-created follices or revived "dead" follicles) rather than existing hair that has just come out of the telogen (i.e., resting) phase. Histogen's paper references the latter:
"Preclinical studies demonstrated no safety issues and suggested that the induction of anagen in telogen follicles in a murine model of hair growth might be accelerated by injection of HSC."
Well either way, don't you think this is better then NOTHING? Given what we have on the market are full of side effects. Heck, if it wasn't for the sides, I would probably be using propecia right now.
TBH imo I think histogens treatment will benefit both diffuse thinners and early norwoods. May also give high NWs more coverage after a hair transplant.
-
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
Well either way, don't you think this is better then NOTHING?
Maybe, maybe not. Some have suggested that minoxidil works primarily by coaxing telogen follicles out of the resting phase, so if that's what HSC is doing, it might not be so different in kind from existing treatments.
The point is that just what HSC is doing, how well it's doing it, and whether it's safe are still issues that are very much up in the air and won't be known until more testing is completed.
Similar Threads
-
By tbtadmin in forum Histogen's Hair Stimulating Complex (HSC)
Replies: 5
Last Post: 07-21-2016, 01:34 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 14
Last Post: 05-09-2011, 03:06 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-04-2010, 09:10 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-17-2010, 01:01 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks