+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 100 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 60 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 992

Thread: Sm04554

  1. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    795

    Default

    Cots does not have a potent FDA approved Wnt promoter and has focused on drugs that are already FDA approved. Perhaps you should realize that some of us broscience PhD's have been following Cots' work for the better part of a decade before putting us down.

  2. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KO1 View Post
    Cots does not have a potent FDA approved Wnt promoter and has focused on drugs that are already FDA approved. Perhaps you should realize that some of us broscience PhD's have been following Cots' work for the better part of a decade before putting us down.
    I wasn't trying to put anyone down, just saying that I'm sure he knows what he's doing.

  3. #93
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready View Post
    I wasn't trying to put anyone down, just saying that I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
    You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.

    Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.

  4. #94
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KO1 View Post
    You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.

    Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.
    Haha, you people are crazy. Maybe I won't post, so I don't have to deal with the vitriolic and insane responses when I've said nothing worthy of intense criticism. Plus, you miss the point of follica being cagey all along - so then, why would they let the world know (as well as other teams working on this issue) what they're working with? How do you know no money went to Follica? You don't, so shut it.

  5. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    795

    Default

    Because I looked at their SEC filings.

  6. #96
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KO1 View Post
    Because I looked at their SEC filings.
    Again, that's great but you weren't aware of their financial info before the $55 million investment. You really don't actually know much about what they've been up to or where they're at, and neither does anybody else on here. I'm just being positive, and yes, I should continue to post because I have informed and positive things to say.

    Congratulations on your phD in broscience and superior knowledge(?) about future hair loss treatments, even though not very much info has been released on follica's progress.

  7. #97
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Guys, guys, guys... Calm down, don't argue with each other we're all balding here lmao. Technically no matter how much we patrol the Internet, research companies, keep up with trials, etc. etc... We are on a public forum, on the blind side of all advances, and are completely at their mercy when it comes to the publicity of their information. Anything on here is usually speculation and opinion. No better than people posting pics of their assh*les. Let's just be patient and see what they reveal.

  8. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KO1 View Post
    You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.

    Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.
    Uh... how do you know that?

  9. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    34

    Default

    do we know the molecular structure of sm04554 ?

  10. #100
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Did anyone sign up for this trial? Would be awesome to get updated through the trial.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By SarahCarter
04-22-2024 04:24 PM
Scar Grafting with Dr Cole
06-21-2012 02:00 PM
Last Post By northeastguy
04-22-2024 10:14 AM
Misinformation Online - The Bald Truth, Friday April 19th, 2024
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
04-19-2024 11:39 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
04-19-2024 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
04-19-2024 07:24 AM