Closed Thread
Page 180 of 187 FirstFirst ... 80 130 170 178 179 180 181 182 ... LastLast
Results 1,791 to 1,800 of 1862
  1. #1791
    Senior Member Arashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nameless View Post
    I would not compare Arishi's arguments to Swoopings. Swoopings positions are well thought out and his concerns are more logical and scientific.

    For example, Swooping says that Histogen has IGF-1 and Histogen isn't growing a lot of hair. Are you saying that this argument by Swooping isn't sound? I think it's sound. Histogen is not growing a ton of hair and they are injecting IGF-1, along with a lot of other growth factors and proteins.

    Then Arishi will come along and say, Follicept is an intentional scam and the company is a big fraud because they won't have the bald truth posters be the test subjects. And the ONLY possible reason for the company not to let the bald truth posters be the test subjects is so that the company can pull a scam. There is no other possible reason. These kinds of statements are ludicrous. Arishi is not giving the company the chance to make the right decision or the wrong decision. First you prove efficacy or otherwise then you see what the company does. It's too early to call the company a scam.
    So can swooping consider this post as a compliment ? Just trying to figure out your post. Thanks jarjar!

  2. #1792
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nameless View Post
    I would not compare Arishi's arguments to Swoopings. Swoopings positions are well thought out and his concerns are more logical and scientific.

    For example, Swooping says that Histogen has IGF-1 and Histogen isn't growing a lot of hair. Are you saying that this argument by Swooping isn't sound? I think it's sound. Histogen is not growing a ton of hair and they are injecting IGF-1, along with a lot of other growth factors and proteins.

    Then Arishi will come along and say, Follicept is an intentional scam and the company is a big fraud because they won't have the bald truth posters be the test subjects. And the ONLY possible reason for the company not to let the bald truth posters be the test subjects is so that the company can pull a scam. There is no other possible reason. These kinds of statements are ludicrous. Arishi is not giving the company the chance to make the right decision or the wrong decision. First you prove efficacy or otherwise then you see what the company does. It's too early to call the company a scam.
    The fact that you and Swooping even attempt to argue that Follicept and Histogen are equatable, simply based on the fact that they share ONE similar ingredient is quite alarming, particularly considering the intelligence Swooping portrays himself to have. You cannot derive any logical conclusion whatsoever based on the fact that two products share a similar ingredient. Just because pizza is not healthy for me, does that mean tomatoes are not healthy either? truly unbelievable

  3. #1793
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stayhopeful View Post
    The fact that you and Swooping even attempt to argue that Follicept and Histogen are equatable, simply based on the fact that they share ONE similar ingredient is quite alarming, particularly considering the intelligence Swooping portrays himself to have. You cannot derive any logical conclusion whatsoever based on the fact that two products share a similar ingredient. Just because pizza is not healthy for me, does that mean tomatoes are not healthy either? truly unbelievable

    Stayhopeful, It's not like Follicept shares one ingredient with Histogen and then Follicept also has other ingredients. That one ingredient that Follicept share with Histogen is the ONLY ingredient that Follicept has.

  4. #1794
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    38

    Default

    is there a date on the release of follicept, or will we soon get one ? ( sorry for my bad english )

  5. #1795
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Why does this thread have 180 pages?

    Is there any proof that it might work on humans, other than the rat pictures?

    This is a serious question, I don't want to read through 180 pages :P

    If there is something significant, please direct me to the page, thanks.

  6. #1796
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    232

    Default

    Guys i think we should focus on the rat picture for once, if we compare the 10ppm and the minox one they are similar in term of cosmetic results, let's pretend it work exactly the same in human, we have the same minox regrowth, slightly better or worse.
    We know two fact, when minox works WELL, give us 2-3 years of hairs back, which is basically a 1.5 nw back, if it doesn't work well people continue to use it being afraid of a minox shedding, so it's a deal with the devil but without a 100% success rate. So even if slightly worse people should use follicept, at least they will cure themself only few days in a year.
    At the same time we know we can use propecia, and that for sure will fight the hairloss cutting the dht, the real question now is why in their theory they think cutting the dht is not necessary anymore? They think the only reason why dht kills the follicle is the igf-1 decrease or what? I wonder if a combo propecia+follicept is more effective, pretending a working follicept next month

  7. #1797
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    17

    Default

    If they said that its not already tested on humans yet, how is possible there are pics of hair grown advance result of their web site ?

    that one:
    http://res.cloudinary.com/hrscywv4p/...ept_hvhpt5.png

    sorry my english, thanks

  8. #1798
    Senior Member noisette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noquierosercalvo View Post
    If they said that its not already tested on humans yet, how is possible there are pics of hair grown advance result of their web site ?

    that one:
    http://res.cloudinary.com/hrscywv4p/...ept_hvhpt5.png

    sorry my english, thanks
    This is a rat, not a human being

  9. #1799
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    17

    Default

    oh that is what i thought, thanks.

  10. #1800
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noisette View Post
    This is a rat, not a human being
    This is all the fight story about, Noisette.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

1800 graft repair case results by Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Navigating the German Job Market as a Kenyan Citizen
11-04-2023 06:31 AM
Last Post By Keegan212
Yesterday 03:51 AM
DR HAKAN DOGANAY/ 4500 GRAFTS / Implanter Pen+FUE
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
Last Post By Hakan Doganay, MD
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
The Mane Event for Thursday, June 15th, 2023
06-15-2023 02:59 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
03-26-2024 08:05 AM