Well said Follicle Death Row.
Replicel
Collapse
X
-
I just find it astonishing that they have not set a specific date for the results.
Does it really take that much intelligence to count a few hairs in a small area of the head?
Maybe they have grown a whole bush of hair which they are finding impossible to count and thats why they are not sure when they will work it out.Comment
-
We have to remember that our collective judgements are being clouded by prior failures (or delayed successes) which don't necessarily have any bearing on Replicel.
There is nothing wrong with a legit +50% increase. This study may not indicate if their technology has the ability to dramatically slow down hairloss. That is valuable in and of itself.
Optomistic, fingers crossed!Comment
-
I assume this treatment would only be used on exposed scalp areas and assume that people who want treatment would have to go back again for more once they have lost a lot of hair.
Surely this would not be injected in an area that is thinning but is still thick..... as the new hair that grows will be getting in the way of the existing hair.Comment
-
It does take some minimal intelligence to understand that the analysis of the clinical trial results involves much more than simply counting hairs.Comment
-
seriously! Even though Replicel operates in Georgia or something, they still have to follow FDA's protocols.... do you know how much paperwork alone there is???Comment
-
who is the "fda" in georgia (union of soviet socialist republics) ?Comment
-
doesn't matter. Replicel said that they will follow FDA's protocols even though they don't operate anywhere near US.... dealing with the FDA means a lot of paperwork. That's why it takes so long to just analyze the resultsComment
-
Interesting read for info on how some u.s drug cos operate overseas...Outside of FDA jurisdiction .
Seeking ever greater profits, drug companies moved much of their testing overseas—with often disastrous results, Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele reveal.
makes me believe even more that may 1st won't differ from last day of April.
The underlying fact is that there is a race to be the first non surgical hair loss cure. They don't have to deal with FDA regulations outside the u.s. If they find cure, they could set up anywhere in the world and they'll make millions. Outside financing wouldn't be a problem....by the time FDA approved, baldness would be a thing of the past for celebrities and those that can afford it..Greed didn't just up and disappear on us ,it's still here and if somebody had a cure I dont seeing them waiting for FDA . If it works, it will eventually be approved for the majority.
Some act like I or others are so shallow but truth is this is a hairloss forum and if your here then they MUST be some level of insecurity within you and it's o.k. Nobody in they right mind wants to lose their hair. Being bald may b sexy to some but let it be by choice. Replicel needs to tell it like it is and not half ass info like ; it works but we cant say how good or it works to a percentage less of 100. That sounds like ROGAINE 2.0......just my morning thoughts.Comment
-
It's going to be beyond depressing if they don't give us any good news this time -which is what I expect. I'll probably be more devastated than any of you here with me losing my transplanted hair. Not that I have too much hope but I'm desperate for something after finding out -in my case- that "the only permanent solution" to hair loss is not permanent at all.Comment
-
Comment
Comment