PRP + Acell Treatment is now available in the UK

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Follicle Death Row
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 1066

    #16
    I concur. You will not find a legitimate scientific reason or believable proposed method of action for this treatment. It should be categorised as pseudoscience bs along with LLLT. I put up a poll about this stuff awhile back. I think it should be called PRP+Acell by the ECE (Easy Cash Extraction) method.

    The doctors that offer this rubbish are laughing all the way to the bank. This industry is still a steaming crock of shite.

    Comment

    • PatientlyWaiting
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1639

      #17
      Originally posted by ThinFast
      Are the injections only done once, or is there a need for follow up injections to maintain any gains like PRP alone is done?
      I would guess you need follow ups for the best results.

      I got Corticosteroid injections by my dermatologist for my Alopecia Areata, I have to take the injections every 3-6 weeks. I got my first injections last week, i'm going back in about 2 weeks. So far so good. The bald spots affected by AA are filling up nice.

      But anyways, I think that's how PRP injections are, only that it take several months for you to go back. And of course they are expensive and medical insurance does not cover them. The Corticosteroid injections are covered.

      Comment

      • Chichano
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 1

        #18
        acell+prp in London

        Comment

        • 2020
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1527

          #19
          sorry to bring this up, but how come you are so sure that it doesn't work?? Didn't they mention that this works best for someone with MODERATE hair loss and didn't they say that the hair "grown/recovered" become immune to baldness??

          Comment

          • Bromin
            Member
            • Nov 2011
            • 76

            #20
            I've spoken to Doctors who have done PRP therapy for baldness and they have said it does indeed stimulate hair growth but it doesn't solve the underlying cause of hair loss for most people with MPH, which is increased levels of DHT. Even if you got hair growth from PRP therapy, they would eventually fall off quickly.

            The procedure itself isn't very pretty and takes quite a bit of manual strain on both the doctor and patient, which deters most doctors from practicing it in the first place.

            I think it would be foolery to say it doesn't help since there is significant scientific data on the benefits of PRP therapy and the therapy itself is evolving to become more beneficial (PRP from fat cells). There are a significant amount of growth factors in our platelets that have been known to initiate regeneration.

            I would still say however, that PRP should be a supplement and one of the last few ditch efforts to increase hair growth since finasteride and minoxidil seems to work for most people.

            Comment

            • DepressedByHairLoss
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2011
              • 876

              #21
              Originally posted by PatientlyWaiting
              I would guess you need follow ups for the best results.

              I got Corticosteroid injections by my dermatologist for my Alopecia Areata, I have to take the injections every 3-6 weeks. I got my first injections last week, i'm going back in about 2 weeks. So far so good. The bald spots affected by AA are filling up nice.

              But anyways, I think that's how PRP injections are, only that it take several months for you to go back. And of course they are expensive and medical insurance does not cover them. The Corticosteroid injections are covered.
              Glad that your bald spots are filling in nicely. Since corticosteroids work well for people with Alopecia Areata, I've always wondered why they aren't tried on people with male pattern baldness. Here is an article that mentions the role that "harmless" steroids could have to stimulate hair regrowth. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0503161344.htm

              Comment

              • TheNitwon
                Member
                • Feb 2012
                • 56

                #22
                Corticosteroids suppress the immune system. Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the hair, and corticosteroids are used to stop this action. Male pattern baldness is caused by DHT, not the immune system, so corticosteroids wouldn't be effective at all for that.

                Comment

                • DepressedByHairLoss
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 876

                  #23
                  Yeah, I don't know that much about corticosteroids so I guess you're right on that one. But as mentioned in the article I linked, there are plenty of other steroids like glucosteroids that could possibly stimulate hair growth. I really wish doctors would try this. Also, I agree that Dr. Hitzig's method of PRP+Acell doesn't work well and the results look far from impressive. But I applaud him for at least trying something new and non-invasive and something other than hair transplantation.

                  Comment

                  • clandestine
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 2005

                    #24
                    Originally posted by DepressedByHairLoss
                    Yeah, I don't know that much about corticosteroids so I guess you're right on that one. But as mentioned in the article I linked, there are plenty of other steroids like glucosteroids that could possibly stimulate hair growth. I really wish doctors would try this. Also, I agree that Dr. Hitzig's method of PRP+Acell doesn't work well and the results look far from impressive. But I applaud him for at least trying something new and non-invasive and something other than hair transplantation.
                    Having listened to last week's TBT, apparently Dr Joseph F. Greco's PRP is better for some reason. Not sure on specifics, perhaps he is more invested in research regarding PRP, etc. But I heard his patients have yielded better results than Hitzig.

                    Comment

                    • SilverSurfer
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 116

                      #25
                      Good Luck Ink

                      Has anyone heard of Good Luck Ink? What do you guys think about these type of treatments, are they effective? Has someone had something similar done? please help

                      Comment

                      • MG63
                        Member
                        • Jan 2010
                        • 30

                        #26
                        I've had two PRP treatments with Dr. Greco and had very good results. At 48 years old. I was surprised how well the weak and nearly dormant hairs responded. I even had grafts from a previous transplant ( 2 years ago) pop up, which I thought were never going to take.

                        Comment

                        • elvispresley
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 115

                          #27
                          Originally posted by MG63
                          I've had two PRP treatments with Dr. Greco and had very good results. At 48 years old. I was surprised how well the weak and nearly dormant hairs responded. I even had grafts from a previous transplant ( 2 years ago) pop up, which I thought were never going to take.
                          hi MG, do u have some photos of your "very good results" ?
                          it will be a great help for the community
                          thx a lot

                          Comment

                          • MG63
                            Member
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 30

                            #28
                            Will post in about a week.

                            Comment

                            • sch89
                              Member
                              • Jun 2011
                              • 38

                              #29
                              Originally posted by MG63
                              Will post in about a week.
                              What was your experience with shedding after your first treatment? Did you shed more/less? I recently had a treatment done about a couple weeks ago, and can't say that I notice any difference either way.

                              Comment

                              • MG63
                                Member
                                • Jan 2010
                                • 30

                                #30
                                With the first treatment, had no shedding, existing hair grew fast, thick and was soft. New hair growth occurred on hairline and crown at 3 months. At 6 months had another treatment, had some shedding of hairs that that were about 1/2" in length, nothing longer. Since then my hair has thicken even more. Dr. Greco is really making progress with this procedure. His work in regenerative medicine outside of hair growth is outstanding.

                                Comment

                                Working...