Dr Nigam patients Qs!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Arashi
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 3888

    #31
    Originally posted by drnigams
    DIDI,
    I was missing you..i talked to nsn on skype two days back..he might send me pics...i discussed with him his progress..

    will persuade him, but slowly... another forum member is coming on 25th may...from france..he will document his case..

    arashi,kindly understand ..he is your fellow member..fighting MPB...he should be left alone for sometime..people can have personal serious issues..just for our benefit...we cannot force..
    .....it is me ,who lost opportunity after he posted his birth mark pics...with 100% regrowth at birthmark donor..not 80/90%..

    I last spoke to obi 15 days back...he has gone/or going to america..said he will send me the pics..i also know his progress..but let both of them send the pics...
    lets wait...i know it would have been great for all of us...
    But every month ,they will be a forum member..so we will see independent documentation ..shortly...
    we can always map,as gc said before even it is 6 month post procedure photo..
    by the time ..i have bigger challenges to improve on the techniques......

    I hired a consultant MD pharma doc today..for attacking follicle inflammation and androgen..and finding implementable topical solutions..

    A thought came to my mind today after talking to him.....this concentration of dht on scalp and the effects of pgd2,prosthamide receptors,mast cells,histamine,leading to hair follicle damage and consequently..fibrosis..needs to addressed aggressively..if we want long term solution...
    Today,i found a very potent mast cell suppresor..
    Which is the most damaging inflammatory cell with release of histamine,cytokines,interlukin 1and 6..which is majorly responsible to damage follicle ,leading to fibrosis...let me see the effects for few months..before i let you all know..it is cleared by FDA for bronchial asthma and allergies..
    it will be an off the label use...
    ....but i plan to tell the patients,... to use it few weeks before they do doubling or take HM injections to suppress scalp follicular inflammation,

    Similarly it is a good idea to reduce scalp load of DHT before and after any procedure for better results...
    Dont get me wrong dr Nigams, I admire what you're doing. But on the other hand some stuff just doesn't add up.

    Anyway, let's forget about that, good luck with your research, it seems you might be onto something !

    Comment

    • drnigams
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 551

      #32
      Arashi,
      Thanks for your motivation...i do understand ..that ,you are ..far away..things may not be adding up..as on today..

      It is the appreciation of forum guys..which is keeping me awake for whole night..i am sleeping,walking,reading,talking,dreaming... how to get there..and members support is critical...to keep me motivated..
      I always want questions to be asked..as they say...keep critics around..if you want to improve and reach excellence..
      but we will waste time..by doubting the integrity..mistakes can happen..not necessarily..intentional...

      Originally posted by Arashi
      Dont get me wrong dr Nigams, I admire what you're doing. But on the other hand some stuff just doesn't add up.

      Anyway, let's forget about that, good luck with your research, it seems you might be onto something !

      Comment

      • One
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 132

        #33
        Originally posted by One
        Dr Nigam you did not explained well, in a technical way would be appreciated, because unlike Dr. Gho you say that you can do sessions 4-5000 grafts at once without stressing the donor, when the Dr.Gho says to do sessions maximum of 1,800 grafts.

        thanks
        News?

        Comment

        • drnigams
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 551

          #34
          ONE,
          studying..pgd2..progenitor cell relationship right now.....your answer tmr..
          briefly regards your querry...we prefer after 4 months of study on cases we did of doubling...invitro is much better technique both for donor and recipient growth ,compared to invivo...yes we extract upto 1500grafts doubling per day...and can repeat the same for continues 3/4 days....how and scientific basis details tmr...

          Originally posted by One
          News?

          Comment

          • garethbale
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 605

            #35
            Hello Dr Nigams

            First of all, thank you for your input on these boards. I enjoy reading your information.

            I wanted to ask, would your hair multiplication/doubling work well for a receding hairline? My hairline is receding but I have no diffuse thinning so my hair on top is quite strong.

            I would like to improve and regrow the hair at my temples and hairline, but it seems hair loss treatments work better for diffuse thinners or on the crown.

            Thank you

            Comment

            • didi
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 1372

              #36
              Originally posted by drnigams
              ONE,
              studying..pgd2..progenitor cell relationship right now.....your answer tmr..
              briefly regards your querry...we prefer after 4 months of study on cases we did of doubling...invitro is much better technique both for donor and recipient growth ,compared to invivo...yes we extract upto 1500grafts doubling per day...and can repeat the same for continues 3/4 days....how and scientific basis details tmr...

              wow, 4-6000 graft in one procedure, that will be the real game changer if you can make it happen and if you are getting 80-90% of donor regeneration you will change this industry forever.

              Who needs HM when doubling of donor several times can do the trick

              Comment

              • One
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 132

                #37
                Originally posted by didi
                wow, 4-6000 graft in one procedure, that will be the real game changer if you can make it happen and if you are getting 80-90% of donor regeneration you will change this industry forever.

                Who needs HM when doubling of donor several times can do the trick
                Bingo!

                Didi, you hit the point.

                What do I need to lose all this time to find the HM formulas, which requires you to return to India after 15 days, when you can have the same hair with 3-4 days of doubling?

                I really do not understand what we're talking about ...

                Comment

                • Arashi
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 3888

                  #38
                  Originally posted by One
                  Bingo!

                  Didi, you hit the point.

                  What do I need to lose all this time to find the HM formulas, which requires you to return to India after 15 days, when you can have the same hair with 3-4 days of doubling?

                  I really do not understand what we're talking about ...
                  My explanation is that Dr Nigams can NOT do, regarding HM doubling, what he says he can. I don't believe it at all. But if you disagree, then you should get onto a plane to India right now, because, just like Didi said, if he can give you 4000-6000 grafts per session and get 80-90% regrowth, then who needs HM ?? He'd basically have cured hairloss.

                  So no, I do not believe it. On the other hand, HM seems very promising. Jahoda already succeeded at creating a bio engineered follicle in human skin (on SCID mouse). If Nigams can repeat Jahoda's tests on humans and have success, THEN we're getting somewhere.

                  Comment

                  • TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 638

                    #39
                    but if we can see proof of these numbers then it means that the baldness is cured as we speak
                    Originally posted by Arashi
                    My explanation is that Dr Nigams can NOT do, regarding HM doubling, what he says he can. I don't believe it at all. But if you disagree, then you should get onto a plane to India right now, because, just like Didi said, if he can give you 4000-6000 grafts per session and get 80-90% regrowth, then who needs HM ?? He'd basically have cured hairloss.

                    So no, I do not believe it. On the other hand, HM seems very promising. Jahoda already succeeded at creating a bio engineered follicle in human skin (on SCID mouse). If Nigams can repeat Jahoda's tests on humans and have success, THEN we're getting somewhere.

                    Comment

                    • Arashi
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2012
                      • 3888

                      #40
                      Originally posted by TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
                      but if we can see proof of these numbers then it means that the baldness is cured as we speak
                      Yep if Dr Nigams can do what he says he can do, he cured baldness already. So why care about HM ? Hair doubling is even safer, since with HM you mess with cells, which brings risk of cancer, with hair doubling you don't (although the growth factors still are somewhat risky of course). Only disadvantage would be you'd sacrifice a few donor hairs but who cares about sacrificing 1500 hairs in donor if you can get 15.000 in recipient in just 3 sessions ?

                      But again, I really don't believe it. I would love to be proven wrong though So if someone feels like going to India to get hair doubling done and document it here, that would be a HUGE thing for this forum.

                      Comment

                      • Henkeh91
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2013
                        • 127

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Arashi
                        Yep if Dr Nigams can do what he says he can do, he cured baldness already. So why care about HM ? Hair doubling is even safer, since with HM you mess with cells, which brings risk of cancer, with hair doubling you don't (although the growth factors still are somewhat risky of course). Only disadvantage would be you'd sacrifice a few donor hairs but who cares about sacrificing 1500 hairs in donor if you can get 15.000 in recipient in just 3 sessions ?

                        But again, I really don't believe it. I would love to be proven wrong though So if someone feels like going to India to get hair doubling done and document it here, that would be a HUGE thing for this forum.
                        There is a french guy at the "Hairsite"-forum that are going to visit Nigams at May 27th. He's going to get both hair doubling and HM-injections. His hair loss isn't that severe though but he promise to share his experience.

                        Comment

                        • Arashi
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2012
                          • 3888

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Henkeh91
                          There is a french guy at the "Hairsite"-forum that are going to visit Nigams at May 27th. He's going to get both hair doubling and HM-injections. His hair loss isn't that severe though but he promise to share his experience.
                          Is he going to get 4000-5000 grafts ? Cause that would be truely interesting ! If he'd go for a regular session, like 1500-2000 it would be much more difficult to prove or disprove Dr Nigams claims.

                          Comment

                          • Arashi
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 3888

                            #43
                            Just read the thread, he's going to bring back his NW2 to original hairline. This usually can be done with 1500 grafts so I doubt he'll go for much more. As long as he takes good high res pictures of his pre-op shaven donor area, we can at least verify donor regrowth.

                            Comment

                            • Arashi
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2012
                              • 3888

                              #44
                              @Dr Nigams: so this might be THE big chance to finally prove your work !! If you really want to prove it, you know what to do: make high quality, high resolution shots of the shaven pre-op donor area, so that we can see how many hairs there originally were in the donor area. That way at least you could prove regrowth. But even better would be if you'd do the same for recipient area. Cause then we could monitor recipient as well and basically we could finally stop arguing and you could call the airport to request more landing strips for all the planes full of people worldwide flying in as a result of that

                              Comment

                              • Henkeh91
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2013
                                • 127

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Arashi
                                Just read the thread, he's going to bring back his NW2 to original hairline. This usually can be done with 1500 grafts so I doubt he'll go for much more. As long as he takes good high res pictures of his pre-op shaven donor area, we can at least verify donor regrowth.
                                Yea.. I guess so. Hopefully we get some decent before and after photos of the donor.

                                Comment

                                Working...