+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 58
  1. #31
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    In other words, your jerk ass behavior has now inconvenienced everyone.
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.

  3. #33
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    883

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place.
    Your behavior more than merited your banishment.

    It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
    Adults are expected to exhibit a higher standard of behavior than the "Mommy, he did it first!" excuse.

  4. #34
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
    so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....

  5. #35
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    883

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
    How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....
    I guess it wasn't that obvious and they will learn the hard way. My prediction is they grow short, thin, unpigmented vellus hairs.

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...

  8. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cleverusername View Post
    Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more
    argumentum ad verecundiam

    would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
    argumentum ad hominem

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.

    Haha ! it's unbelievable that people take that clown ironman seriously. His posting has reached a feverish pitch lately. He's getting more and more panicked the more people start to pay attention to replicel. I've never seen a more blatant case of someone having an incomplete understanding of the literature, or worse, someone who's cherry picking quotes from select papers to support his preformed ideas.

  10. #40
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    883

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    argumentum ad verecundiam
    Of course, those who understand the proper meaning of the term would know that it's a valid inductive argument, not a logical fallacy.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-02-2011, 04:11 AM
  2. Possible cure for baldness?
    By Flowers in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-04-2011, 09:55 AM
  3. just saw this on cbs cure for baldness- hopefully
    By Thebaldone1 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2011, 09:03 PM
  4. A cow cure the baldness
    By Wanthair in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-04-2010, 01:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 02:28 PM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
Yesterday 08:34 AM
My FUE Into FUT Scar Result Revealed After 5 Years
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
2 operations with Asmed, Dr. Erdogan - 2007 and 2016
10-06-2020 10:53 AM
Last Post By sicore8826
04-12-2024 02:41 PM