Replicel

[krewel]

http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/health/...e#.UGf544aWJI1

Here a little video about Yales hair research. They actually confirm Dr.Hoffmanns / Replicels thesis about dermal sheeth cup cells..

[534623]

http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/health/...e#.UGf544aWJI1

They actually confirm Dr.Hoffmanns / Replicels thesis about dermal sheeth cup cells..

can't find anywhere any confirmation.

the only confirmation we have is by the Replicel guys themselves:

if you inject millions of replicated human dscc into a patient's bald scalp - it grows practically NOTHING. Confirmed by Replicel!

[krewel]

can't find anywhere any confirmation.

the only confirmation we have is by the Replicel guys themselves:

if you inject millions of replicated human dscc into a patient's bald scalp - it grows practically NOTHING. Confirmed by Replicel!

Watch the video again, inform yourself about how Replicels technology works in detail and stop spreading this "Replicel failed" nonsense. Otherwise you belong to hairsite, not here.
I can see that there's a lot, you understand in a wrong way. I've explained it a 100 times here and I'm not going to explain it again.

Replicel did not fail. Far from it.
If you really expected something like 50% regrwoth, you are literally insane.

[UK_]

@krewel http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/health/...e#.UGge2a7lawS

They say it's years away, but Replicel are already heading into phase 2.

[krewel]

@krewel http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/health/...e#.UGge2a7lawS

They say it's years away, but Replicel are already heading into phase 2.

Which is great.

The video shows, that Replicel is going the right way. The stem cells that female Yale scientist is pointing at on her screen are dermal sheath cup cells, the ones that Replicels guys are using.
They did not find out something new. But thanks to their technology, they actually show, that Dr.Hoffmanns research results about dermal sheath cup cells are true.

Edit: But also Aderans. Both concepts are actually very similar to each other.

[534623]

The video shows, that Replicel is going the right way. The stem cells that female Yale scientist is pointing at on her screen are dermal sheath cup cells, the ones that Replicels guys are using.

not at all.
the 2 women in the video sound like the Aderans guys 10 years ago - about their initial mouse research findings.

[25 going on 65]

But Aderans in 2002 is a world apart from Replicel in 2012. Back then people got excited about growing hairs on a mouse. Now we are safely growing hair on human scalp. That is a monumental leap that not everyone seems to appreciate....taking results on a rodent species and replicating them on ourselves.
Even if Replicel never gets to market, we have learned from its research and other companies can apply this knowledge. This goes for all research on "next gen" treatments.

I'm excited about these cellular procedures. Right now the only cosmetically viable ways to fight MPB are 1. get on hormone therapy early (fin or dut), or 2. get hair transplants from one of a hand full of quality clinics in the world (and we all know the limitations of that). I think treating this condition at the cell level is the next step.
I would love for some super effective PGD2 inhibitor lotion to come out in the next couple years, but I am not holding my breath.

[krewel]

not at all.
the 2 women in the video sound like the Aderans guys 10 years ago - about their initial mouse research findings.

What the heck are you talking about?
I said : "The stem cells that female Yale scientist is pointing at on her screen are dermal sheath cup cells"

You say not at all? Are you blind or something? From now on, I'm just ignoring you. 10 years.. 10 years is nothing in terms of science.

Jesus Christ - what is it with people and attacking Replicel? I'd love to see the look on all your faces if they turned around and said "right, screw it, go find your own cure".

Their reaction would probably be something like: "I knew it, scammers." Thinking, you can solve this kind of a problem from one day to another, is just childish.

[neversaynever]

Im a positive fellow, but sorry...Repicel are a fail. If all they can do is up the cell dose, it wont work.

We are not mice. Stuff that works on mice wont work on us. This has been proven over and over again.

But at least theyre carrying on, you never know. If they could offer 20% regrowth for $2000 and prove that regrown hairs wont start thinning again...could be a winner.

[Pate]

Im a positive fellow, but sorry...Repicel are a fail. If all they can do is up the cell dose, it wont work.

We are not mice. Stuff that works on mice wont work on us. This has been proven over and over again.

But at least theyre carrying on, you never know. If they could offer 20% regrowth for $2000 and prove that regrown hairs wont start thinning again...could be a winner.

I used to agree but I'm actually coming around to the "immunisation from DHT" theory. Given what we know about fibrosis.

We also need to wait and see if the vellus hairs they grew go terminal by 24 months. 20% increase in terminal hair count actually starts to look vaguely interesting, especially if compoundable and permanent.

Replicel need to seriously pick their game up, but I'm not writing them off completely yet. Maybe just 70% written off. :-)