Something new?

This is just to good to be true. As someone har remarked, this can not go under the radar if it`s working as well as they claim. Searched their website, and I couldnt find any pictures yet. Hopefully they will have something up soon, so that we can take a deeper look at this. Has someone tried to call them og contact them in any kind of way?

pictures don't look so good... there has been an improvement but it's far from a complete recovery

There's no way this is legit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ccmethinning

There's no way this is legit.

---

Your reasoning being..?

I understand the want to immediately reject newly proposed treatment options based on intuition, but should we not attempt to first validate or discredit said treatments through trial rather than scrutiny and bias opinion?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bananana

This new thing is very dodgy - if 30 000 people were "cured" it would be all over the news!

---

They didn't say they'd "cured" 30,000 people; they said they'd administered "more than 28,000 treatments." We don't know their sample size -- maybe 14 people received 2,000 treatments each.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clandestine

Can't figure out if this treatment is already being administered to the public? Or, if not, when it will indeed be released.

Regardless, before and after photos are here: [http://www.biologixhair.com/index.cfm]. Click the green arrow to the right on the picture towards the top.

---

The pictures are horrible. Absolutely horrible.

Ian Park's Before and After don't even look like the same head of hair unless he dyed it.

Gina Galvis' has what is an obvious part in her hair with additional loss that is combed over in the After photo, so its not even a good comparison photo.

John Candil's B/A looks like its just grown longer and combed, and he dyed his hair too.

Maria Miranda also has a part line and the After photo doesn't even remotely show the same unless again it was combed over. Perhaps the angle is slightly different so that front part appears longer in the one photo...


Ugh.


When the B/A photos aren't even deadly obvious on the supposed improvement, you know its nothing amazing. They all look user submitted too since they aren't consistent.

Truth, truth.

Honestly I wasn't impressed with the before and afters, if you look at the images of where each client is predominantly balding you may notice as I have a slight variation in hair colour which resembles the use of a hair concealer product such as toppik.

anyone else's thoughts on this?

My snake-oil detection gland is tingling...

their website does look nice and probably expensive and apparently they also have an office in downtown Toronto so this is probably a legit company... not sure about the product, we'll have to wait :p