In the Hellouser/Gail Naughton interview she says it'll be a fraction of what a hair transplant costs. Plus, if it's available in Japan and Mexico then that's not a particularly expensive flight for many people.
I mean if this is genuine then that is some incredible progress
01-06-2016 01:38 AM
JulioGP
Quote:
Originally Posted by joachim
although after the histogen interview it looks like the product works to some degree, the before/after pics are very fishy and clearly presented in a way that we get tricked. all those pics are shown with different angles and some kind of combovers. i believe, there is some improvement with histogen, but not as much as they want us make believe. those pics are clearly beautified and even a bit manipulated like the picture with the changed marking line shows. the line is simply not the same, which could be seen as trickery.
of course it can't be the same line, because let's try to find a volunteer who doesn't mind having such a line on his head for many weeks. not many would do that. thus, the line was washed off probably after the before pic, and then, the second time the line was drawn, it simply was drawn much higher, to make people believe of good regrowth. also the changed viewing angle in the after pic contributes to this effect.
we can only hope that histogen doesn't lie with their macropic-trichoscan numbers, but those pictures are clearly trickery. i also have a theory on the other two after pictures shown in the presentation. to me, even they look like they want to trick us. however, the pics are discussed also on another forum. many members believe the results are real, where a few of them think they are tricked. in my opinion the truth is somewhere in the middle, but the trickery on the images show me already that histogen currently is still a bubble.
It's hard to understand why they changed the line marking.
It is clear that in the first picture the line was more forward and in the second picture, perhaps to impress, they put the line further back.
It just takes away the credibility of the results, even before the product is launched.
$2k for two treatments? That sounds very affordable. Do you know how many injections they administer in one treatment? Like is one treatment one injection or is it 20 injections?
01-27-2016 07:10 AM
Vic
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatientlyWaiting
$2k for two treatments? That sounds very affordable. Do you know how many injections they administer in one treatment? Like is one treatment one injection or is it 20 injections?
That's less per treatment then the money I wasted on PRP!
01-29-2016 03:28 AM
Aik82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic
That's less per treatment then the money I wasted on PRP!
I wonder how many injections will be needed to have FULL head of hair, FULL density and (close to) teenage hairline.
01-29-2016 03:45 AM
Swooping
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aik82
I wonder how many injections will be needed to have FULL head of hair, FULL density and (close to) teenage hairline.
None, because it won't bring you a full head of hair lol.
01-29-2016 05:11 AM
Follisket
As many as it takes to kill you so you can reincarnate as a fullhead.
01-29-2016 11:44 AM
jamesst11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swooping
None, because it won't bring you a full head of hair lol.
I think that if this does what they say it does AND you have lost most of your hair recently (and you still have decent length vellus hair) then it could restore a lot of that. no?
