• 04-19-2012 01:40 PM
    2020
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    In other words, your jerk ass behavior has now inconvenienced everyone.

    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
  • 04-19-2012 01:51 PM
    ccmethinning
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions

    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
  • 04-19-2012 01:56 PM
    gmonasco
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place.

    Your behavior more than merited your banishment.

    Quote:

    It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
    Adults are expected to exhibit a higher standard of behavior than the "Mommy, he did it first!" excuse.
  • 04-19-2012 02:32 PM
    2020
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.

    so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....
  • 04-19-2012 03:28 PM
    gmonasco
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.

    How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.
  • 04-19-2012 03:29 PM
    ccmethinning
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....

    I guess it wasn't that obvious and they will learn the hard way. My prediction is they grow short, thin, unpigmented vellus hairs.
  • 04-19-2012 03:38 PM
    cleverusername
    Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
  • 04-19-2012 03:46 PM
    ccmethinning
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cleverusername View Post
    Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more

    argumentum ad verecundiam

    Quote:

    would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
    argumentum ad hominem
  • 04-19-2012 03:48 PM
    The Alchemist
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.


    Haha ! it's unbelievable that people take that clown ironman seriously. His posting has reached a feverish pitch lately. He's getting more and more panicked the more people start to pay attention to replicel. I've never seen a more blatant case of someone having an incomplete understanding of the literature, or worse, someone who's cherry picking quotes from select papers to support his preformed ideas.
  • 04-19-2012 03:53 PM
    gmonasco
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    argumentum ad verecundiam

    Of course, those who understand the proper meaning of the term would know that it's a valid inductive argument, not a logical fallacy.

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth