Replicel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sausage

Someones either crazy or knows something.

---

Not really either. It's not a suspiciously large volume of shares, nor is it a "crazy" amount of money for someone with a bit of investment cash to spend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sausage

Someones either crazy or knows something.

---

There have been PLENTY of days where there have been 10k plus shares traded in large chunks. Some of those days have been up (buying pressure), some of them have been down (selling pressure).

oh balls, all this speculating and waiting is getting on my tits.....

hope there is no delay.

I hope its good news for all of our sakes.

Did they specify a date? Or it's still 'sometime end of April'?

Didn't just late last year "they" announce a study that showed slick bald patches had the hair follicile, it was just dormant - basically it refused to grow because of how starved it was?

I'm too lazy to find that article.

"They" was some other organization/university or something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt

Didn't just late last year "they" announce a study that showed slick bald patches had the hair follicile, it was just dormant - basically it refused to grow because of how starved it was?

I'm too lazy to find that article.

"They" was some other organization/university or something.

---

why would then Replicel make their injection into the temples??? Is that like a common place to make injections or were they just trying to show off that they are able to grow hair even in bald spots?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2020

why would then Replicel make their injection into the temples??? Is that like a common place to make injections or were they just trying to show off that they are able to grow hair even in bald spots?

---

That was my initial thought, and it could still be true. However, there are other possibilities. And that is it serves two purposes, one being that, depending on the amount of balding, it could be a "blank slate" and therefore easier to get an accurate count on the area and demonstrate efficacy (hoping for a nice semi-macro head shot with easily visible hair regrowth), and the second, is that it would allow for a higher percentage result - kind of a knock your socks off type result because the hair baseline count would be lower compared to a scalp zone just initially starting to bald.

Just my 2 cents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt

Didn't just late last year "they" announce a study that showed slick bald patches had the hair follicile, it was just dormant - basically it refused to grow because of how starved it was?

I'm too lazy to find that article.

"They" was some other organization/university or something.

---

I think you're thinking of Cotsarelis's announcement that they found stem cells in the slick bald patches - not follicles.

Is there a recent summarized annual report for Replicel?

Didn't spencer say he should know something by mid week? so im guessing tomorrow he could prob tell us something...