I'm not touching on the virgin part of the post BUT… This is nonsense.
Women are key holders to sex. Biologically women hold more importance than men. We are disposable. That importance however comes with inherent responsibilities. The implications of sex are much greater for a female.
While it's a different time the same principles apply. A women who doesn't sleep around highlights strong values for her gender: Self control and virtuousness. These qualities are attractive to men.
A male who attains numerous sexual partners presents similar qualities which are attractive to females. Like I said: Females are the key holders to sex. They could have it as much as they want, whenever they want with so much as a look and a smile.
It's easy to be a slut. It's hard to be a stud. If a male is attaining numerous sexual partners he is doing so through desirable qualities such as: Physical fitness, confidence, self control and hard work. These qualities are attractive to females.
This isn't sexist. It's nature.
[Strange conversation for a hair loss forum lol].
I totally agree. But feminazis obviously want people to ignore those biological differences.
01-09-2015 10:49 AM
cookies
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasari
I'm not touching on the virgin part of the post BUT… This is nonsense.
Women are key holders to sex. Biologically women hold more importance than men. We are disposable. That importance however comes with inherent responsibilities. The implications of sex are much greater for a female.
While it's a different time the same principles apply. A women who doesn't sleep around highlights strong values for her gender: Self control and virtuousness. These qualities are attractive to men.
A male who attains numerous sexual partners presents similar qualities which are attractive to females. Like I said: Females are the key holders to sex. They could have it as much as they want, whenever they want with so much as a look and a smile.
It's easy to be a slut. It's hard to be a stud. If a male is attaining numerous sexual partners he is doing so through desirable qualities such as: Physical fitness, confidence, self control and hard work. These qualities are attractive to females.
This isn't sexist. It's nature.
[Strange conversation for a hair loss forum lol].
There is a difference in recognising sexual absitence in women an attractive trait from an evolutionary point of view (which is debatable), and calling a woman who has sex before marriage a slut, in this day and age where having sex as a women does not come with great responsibilities.
01-21-2015 01:29 PM
htalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred970
You should never marry a woman who's not a virgin, so you did it right. No hymen, no diamond.
I'm not touching on the virgin part of the post BUT… This is nonsense.
